Depression in Ugandan caregivers of cancer patients: The role of coping strategies and social support
Abstract
Background Palliative care services involve the psychological care of the caregivers of cancer patients. Psychological conditions, especially depression among caregivers, distort caregiving roles; thus, it can increase a patient's psychological suffering. Objective To determine the prevalence of depression and associated coping strategies among caregivers of cancer patients at a rural cancer care facility. Methods This cross-sectional study was among 366 caregivers of cancer patients. The data was collected using a pretested questionnaire, where the symptoms of depression were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at a cutoff of 10 out of 27. The coping strategies were assessed based on the Brief-coping orientation to problems experienced Inventory. Logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with depression. Results The mean age of the participants was 39.01 (±11.50) years; most were females (60.38%). The prevalence of depression was 8.2%. The identified factors associated with increased likelihood of depression were coping strategies: active coping (aOR = 1.55, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.05-2.28, p = 0.026), denial (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20-2.19, p = 0.001), and humor (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.11-1.84, p = 0.005). However, coping with positive reframing reduced the likelihood of depression (aOR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52-0.94, p = 0.019). There was no significant association between depression and social support. Conclusion The lower prevale…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La sobrecarga del cuidador puede distorsionar el rol de cuidado aumentando el sufrimiento del paciente con cáncer.
“además pueden distorsionar el rol de cuidado aumentando el sufrimiento del paciente con cáncer (Nuwamanya et al., 2023).”
From Sobrecarga de trabajo en cuidadores de pacientes en cuidados paliativos oncológicos: Una revisión bibliográfica (2023) · cites this paper as Nuwamanya et al., 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Villa Clavijo, C. G., Feijoo Espinosa, M. A., Huayllasaca Sarmiento, W. C., Chávez Prieto, H. S., & Cualchi Alvarracin, G. P. (2023) · Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar · doi:10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.6094
- Authors
- Nuwamanya, S., Nkola, R., Najjuka, S. M., Nabulo, H., Al‐Mamun, F., Mamun, M. A., & Kaggwa, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology (UG)
- Makerere University (UG)
- University of South Asia (BD)
- Jahangirnagar University (BD)
- Corresponding author
- Kaggwa, Mark Mohan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-10-31
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-124
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W4307352670
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Keywords
- caregiver depression, cancer caregivers, coping strategies, social support, palliative care, rural cancer care, Uganda, active coping, denial, humor, positive reframing, depression prevalence
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Social Support, Uganda, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review