The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post‐treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: a qualitative insight
Abstract
There is an increasing number of long‐term survivors of cervical and endometrial cancer for whom quality of life is of major importance. We interviewed 20 women (aged 19–64) to explore the dynamics and components of post‐treatment sexual adjustment and its impact on quality of life. Stratification by treatment received (surgery alone, surgery plus external‐beam radiation, surgery plus brachytherapy, and surgery plus external‐beam radiation and brachytherapy) and time since treatment (immediately post treatment, during the next 2 years and thereafter) was undertaken, to ensure representation of all relevant experiences and views, and to allow time for any long‐term side effects to appear. The NUD*IST software (Non‐numerical Unstructured Data by Indexing, Searching and Theorising) was used to assist with the coding of audio‐taped, transcribed interviews and to search for themes and segments. While the data supported findings reported in the literature, important new themes emerged in the course of the qualitative analysis. These included: (a) issues related to being ‘feminine’, (b) the role of intimacy in post‐treatment adjustment and (c) the importance of communication between health professionals, patients and partners. A model is presented that integrates these issues and highlights the need for effective interventions to improve post‐treatment outcomes. The provision of information, support and modification of rehabilitation devices is suggested. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466599162782 · Cited by 2,491
Cited by
A psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer.
Brotto, L. A., Heiman, J. R., Goff, B., Greer, B., Lentz, G. M., Swisher, E., Tamimi, H., & Van Blaricom, A. (2008) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9196-x · Cited by 278
A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors
Abbott-Anderson, K., & Kwekkeboom, K. L. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030 · Cited by 263
The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life—The components and means for management
Herzog, T. J., & Wright, J. D. (2007) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.019 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Juraskova, I., Butow, P., Robertson, R., Sharpe, L., McLeod, C., & Hacker, N.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-279
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W1999801628
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post‐treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: a qualitative insight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.639
- The paper
- Juraskova, I., Butow, P., Robertson, R., Sharpe, L., McLeod, C., & Hacker, N. (2003). Post‐treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: a qualitative insight. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.