The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual framework for patient–professional communication: an application to the cancer context
Abstract
We present a conceptual framework of one‐to‐one, in‐person communication that occurs between a health‐care professional and a patient. The framework is intended as a tool for organizing and summarizing relevant research but it can also help guide assessing the communication process and can help guide development of interventions to improve the process. The framework includes four key components, with a focus on elements that can be modified. The first component is the focus of the interaction: each participant's communication goals. The second component consists of the participants themselves, each with five key attributes that determine, in part, how they address their goals. The third component is the communication process: each person both conveys messages and receives messages, and the messages themselves can be verbal, non‐verbal, or silent. The communication process is iterative and extended in time with one act having an impact on following acts. Finally, the fourth component is the environment in which the communication occurs, both the immediate physical setting and the context beyond. Important aspects of the environment, identified as external factors, affect the communication process through their impact on the participants' attributes. The framework builds on classic communication frameworks to which it adds unique elements. Some of its unique aspects include the prominent role of the participants' goals and its distinct recognition that messages are conveyed through silence. The framework serves as a common conceptualization of factors important to successful communication for the remaining review papers in this series and for future studies of practitioner–patient communication. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language · doi:10.4135/9781446221815.n7 · Cited by 15,148
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 1×
“…roles and power in the patient–professional relationship underlie whether the decision making process is paternalistic, Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Psycho-Oncology 14: 801–809 (2005) shared, or patient driven (Charles et al., 1997, 1999; Degner et al., 1997; Emanuel and Emanuel, 1992).”
BackgroundDoctor-patient communication: a review of the literature
Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m · Cited by 2,430
Research on the Relationship between Verbal and Nonverbal Communication: Emerging Integrations
Jones, S. E., & LeBaron, C. D. (2002) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02559.x · Cited by 223 · cited 1×
“‘Verbal’ refers to messages that are expressed using words (Gleitman, 1991) via either talking (Jones and LeBaron, 2002) or other modes of expression such as sign language.”
BackgroundPresurgery Experiences of Prostate Cancer Patients and Their Spouses
Gray, R. E., Fitch, M. I., Phillips, C., Labrecque, M., & Klotz, L. (1999) · Cancer Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07308.x · Cited by 150 · cited 2×
“We include transient emotions, that might change within a particular communication session, and emotions of short duration (i.e. mood or states (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1985)) such as a patient’s first reaction of shock at the cancer diagnosis (Gray et al., 1999; O’Rourke and Germino, 1998).”
Background
Cited by
The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review
Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Parker, P. A. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.949 · Cited by 398
A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care
Lelorain, S., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., & Sultan, S. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2115 · Cited by 289
Laukka, E., Huhtakangas, M., Heponiemi, T., Kujala, S., Kaihlanen, A.-M., Gluschkoff, K., & Kanste, O. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21623 · Cited by 65
du Pon, E., Wildeboer, A. T., van Dooren, A. A., Bilo, H. J. G., Kleefstra, N., & van Dulmen, S. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4572-5 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldman‐Stewart, D., Brundage, M. D., & Tishelman, C.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 801-809
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2085427210
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.