The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High‐Capacity Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Choice of Elements and Structures for Active Particles
Abstract
Growing market demand for portable energy storage has triggered significant research on high‐capacity lithium‐ion (Li‐ion) battery anodes. Various elements have been utilized in innovative structures to enable these anodes, which can potentially increase the energy density and decrease the cost of Li‐ion batteries. In this review, electrode and material parameters are considered in anode fabrication. The periodic table is then used to explore how the choice of anode material affects rate performance, cycle stability, Li‐ion insertion/extraction potentials, voltage hysteresis, volumetric and specific capacities, and other critical parameters. Silicon (Si), germanium (Ge), and tin (Sn) anodes receive more attention in literature and in this review, but other elements, such as antimony (Sb), lead (Pb), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), gallium (Ga), phosphorus (P), arsenic (As), bismuth (Bi), and zinc (Zn) are also discussed. Among conversion anodes focus is placed on oxides, nitrides, phosphides, and hydrides. Nanostructured carbon (C) receives separate consideration. Issues in high‐ capacity research, such as volume change, insufficient coulombic efficiency, and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer stability are elucidated. Finally, advanced carbon composites utilizing carbon nanotubes (CNT), graphene, and size preserving external shells are discussed, including high mass loading (thick) electrodes and electrodes capable of providing load‐bearing properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Conversion Reaction‐Based Oxide Nanomaterials for Lithium Ion Battery Anodes
Yu, S., Lee, S. H., Lee, D. J., Sung, Y., & Hyeon, T. (2016) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201502299 · Cited by 499
Kim, N., Chae, S., Ma, J., Ko, M., & Cho, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y · Cited by 434
The progress on aluminum-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, H., Tan, H., Luo, X., Wang, H., Ma, T., Lv, M., Song, X., Jin, S., Chang, X., & Li, X. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta09762d · Cited by 114
Doglione, R., Vankova, S., Amici, J., & Penazzi, N. (2017) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.125 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Nitta, N., & Yushin, G.
- Venue
- Particle & Particle Systems Characterization
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-336
- ISSN
- 0934-0866 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4117
- OpenAlex
- W2015387690
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Capacity Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Choice of Elements and Structures for Active Particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ppsc.201300231
- The paper
- Nitta, N., & Yushin, G. (2014). High‐Capacity Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Choice of Elements and Structures for Active Particles. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201300231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.