Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Rabin, Harvey R., Butler, Steven M., Wohl, Mary Ellen B., Geller, David E., Colin, Andrew A., Schidlow, Daniel V., Johnson, Charles A., Konstan, Michael W., Regelmann, Warren E.·2004·Pediatric Pulmonology

Abstract

The clinical characteristics most relevant to the decision to treat for a pulmonary exacerbation with antibiotics in cystic fibrosis patients were determined. Variables including age, increased cough frequency and sputum production, new crackles and wheezing, asthma, symptomatic sinusitis, hemoptysis, decreased lung function, weight loss, and new acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were collected in a large prospective multicenter database (Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis). During a 12‐month baseline period, data from 11,692 patients were compared with data collected during the subsequent 6‐month study period. Because pulmonary function assessments were unavailable for patients <6 years of age, separate analyses were done for those <6 and ≥6 years of age. The outcome of interest was any antibiotic treatment in the 6‐month study period reported as indicated for an exacerbation. Characteristics with the most discriminatory power were determined using stepwise multiple logistic regression. For patients <6 years of age, the strongest independent associations with treatment for a pulmonary exacerbation were new crackles, increased cough frequency, decline in weight, and increased sputum production. For those patients ≥6 years of age, the strongest independent associations were a relative decrease in percent predicted forced expired volume in 1 sec, increased cough frequency, new crackles, and hemoptysis. The presence of three or more of these key characteristics was strongly associated with the occurrence of a treated exacerbation. The reproducibility of the model over time was confirmed by application to a subsequent set of data. This model has potential for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials, and to assist in treatment decisions for individual patients. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004; 37:400–406. © 2004 Wiely‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ppul.20023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Rabin, H. R., Butler, S. M., Wohl, M. E. B., Geller, D. E., Colin, A. A., Schidlow, D. V., Johnson, C. A., Konstan, M. W., & Regelmann, W. E.
Venue
Pediatric Pulmonology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04-13
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
400-406
ISSN
  • 1099-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-6863
OpenAlex
W2056538792
Cited by
245
References
2
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ppul.20023
The paper
Rabin, H. R., Butler, S. M., Wohl, M. E. B., Geller, D. E., Colin, A. A., Schidlow, D. V., Johnson, C. A., Konstan, M. W., & Regelmann, W. E. (2004). Pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. Pediatric Pulmonology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.