Cited by 51Asthma and respiratory diseasesInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryPharmacy and Medical Practices

Assessment of inhalation technique and determinants of incorrect performance among children with asthma

Walia, Mandeep, Paul, Lincy, Satyavani, A., Lodha, Rakesh, Kalaivani, Mani, Kabra, S.K.·2006·Pediatric Pulmonology

Abstract

The objective of our study was to evaluate the pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with holding chamber technique of asthmatic children attending out patient pediatric chest clinic and determine factors associated with incorrect technique. All patients had previously received instructions regarding inhalation technique. The inhalation technique was assessed on a five‐point checklist, four of which were considered essential. Two hundred and thirteen children (mean ± SD age, 7.3 ± 3.8 years; 151 boys) completed the study. Children were using their inhaler for a median duration of 6 months (range 1–96 months). One hundred and eighty‐eight patients (88.3%) performed all essential steps correctly. The commonest mistake among the essential steps was not shaking the inhaler (n = 21, 9.9%) followed by inability to make a tight seal around the mouthpiece of the holding chamber (n = 12, 5.6%). Correct technique was not affected by gender, asthma severity and socio‐economic indices: education level of parents, percapita monthly income, rural or urban background. Our study indicates that a large majority of children from a developing country setting, irrespective of lower education and income levels can be successfully educated to appropriately use inhalation device. Inhalation performance is not affected by socio‐economic background of the patients. Comprehensive inhalation instructions and monitoring at each visit are however critical to ensure reliable and consistent performance of correct technique among asthmatic children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006, 41:1082–1087. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ppul.20498

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walia, M., Paul, L., Satyavani, A., Lodha, R., Kalaivani, M., & Kabra, S. K.
Affiliations
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Kabra, S.K.
Venue
Pediatric Pulmonology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-20
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1082-1087
ISSN
  • 1099-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-6863
OpenAlex
W2040407948
Cited by
51
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Pulmonology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
inhaler technique, asthma, children, pressurized metered-dose inhaler, holding chamber, inhaler technique errors, patient education, socioeconomic factors, inhaler use, developing countries
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Self Administration, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Metered Dose Inhalers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review