Cited by 38Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Quantification of seven apolipoproteins in human plasma by proteotypic peptides using fast LC‐MS/MS

Ceglarek, Uta, Dittrich, Julia, Becker, Susen, Baumann, Frank, Kortz, Linda, Thiery, Joachim·2013·PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated different sample pretreatment strategies and developed a standardized sample pretreatment protocol for absolute quantification of seven apolipoproteins (Apos) in human serum by LC‐MS/MS using proteotypic peptides and corresponding stable isotope‐labeled peptides as internal standards. Experimental design: Micro‐LC was coupled with quadrupole‐linear ion trap MS for quantification and peptide confirmation. Denaturation, reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion including ultrasound and microwave assistance were investigated. Method comparison of 50 plasma samples with an immunoassay was performed for A po A‐I and A po B. Results: Tryptic digestion times ranged between 5 min (A po A‐I, A po E, A po A‐IV) and 16 h (A po A‐II). Ultrasound and microwave assistance did not improve the digestion yield. Linearity was found between 0.1 nmol/L and 100 mmol/L. The lower limits of quantification were ≤0.4 μmol/L for A po A‐I, A po A‐IV, A po B‐100, A po C‐I, A po C‐III, A po E, and <1.4 μmol/L for A po A‐II. CV <13% were determined. Comparison with immunoassays showed a good agreement for A po A‐I and A po B. Conclusion and clinical relevance: The validated preanalytical protocol enables a reliable simultaneous analysis of seven A pos in human serum without depletion. The method can now be applied in clinical studies to investigate the A po distributions in cardiovascular diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prca.201300034

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ceglarek, U., Dittrich, J., Becker, S., Baumann, F., Kortz, L., & Thiery, J.
Affiliations
University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Corresponding author
Ceglarek, Uta
Venue
PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-31
Volume
7
Issue
11-12
Pages
794-801
ISSN
  • 1862-8346 (ISSN-L)
  • 1862-8354
OpenAlex
W2049746621
Cited by
38
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
apolipoproteins, absolute quantification, proteotypic peptides, isotope-labeled internal standards, sample preparation, trypsin digestion, microwave digestion, human serum, immunoassay comparison, cardiovascular disease
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins, Blood Chemical Analysis, Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Peptides, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review