Cited by 13Heat shock proteins researchBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProtein Structure and Dynamics

Plasticity and transient binding are key ingredients of the periplasmic chaperone network.

Open access
Chum, Aaron P., Shoemaker, Sophie R., Fleming, Patrick J., Fleming, Karen G.·2019·Protein Science

Abstract

SurA, Skp, FkpA, and DegP constitute a chaperone network that ensures biogenesis of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in Gram‐negative bacteria. Both Skp and FkpA are holdases that prevent the self‐aggregation of unfolded OMPs, whereas SurA accelerates folding and DegP is a protease. None of these chaperones is essential, and we address here how functional plasticity is manifested in nine known null strains. Using a comprehensive computational model of this network termed OMPBioM, our results suggest that a threshold level of steady state holdase occupancy by chaperones is required, but the cell is agnostic to the specific holdase molecule fulfilling this function. In addition to its foldase activity, SurA moonlights as a holdase when there is no expression of Skp and FkpA. We further interrogate the importance of chaperone–client complex lifetime by conducting simulations using lifetime values for Skp complexes that range in length by six orders of magnitude. This analysis suggests that transient occupancy of durations much shorter than the Escherichia coli doubling time is required. We suggest that fleeting chaperone occupancy facilitates rapid sampling of the periplasmic conditions, which ensures that the cell can be adept at responding to environmental changes. Finally, we calculated the network effects of adding multivalency by computing populations that include two Skp trimers per unfolded OMP. We observe only modest perturbations to the system. Overall, this quantitative framework of chaperone–protein interactions in the periplasm demonstrates robust plasticity due to its dynamic binding and unbinding behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.3641

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The release of the mature domain into the periplasm is likely supported by periplasmic chaperones.

    “This latter step is likely supported by periplasmic chaperones (Schäfer et al., 1999; Furst et al., 2018; Chum et al., 2019; Mas et al., 2019) (see below).”

    From The Dynamic SecYEG Translocon (2021) · cites this paper as Chum et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chum, A. P., Shoemaker, S. R., Fleming, P. J., & Fleming, K. G.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Fleming, Karen G.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-23
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
1340-1349
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W2944015260
Cited by
13
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (MCB1412108)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM079440)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
outer membrane protein biogenesis, SurA, Skp, FkpA, DegP, foldases, functional plasticity, transient binding, multivalency, Escherichia coli, Gram-negative bacteria
MeSH terms
Cell Plasticity, Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Molecular Chaperones, Periplasm, Protein Interaction Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review