Cited by 15Protein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingEnzyme Structure and Function

AlphaFold accurately predicts distinct conformations based on the oligomeric state of a de novo designed protein

Open access
Cummins, Matthew C., Jacobs, Tim M., Teets, Frank D., DiMaio, Frank, Tripathy, Ashutosh, Kuhlman, Brian·2022·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Using the molecular modeling program Rosetta, we designed a de novo protein, called SEWN0.1, which binds the heterotrimeric G protein Gα q. The design is helical, well‐folded, and primarily monomeric in solution at a concentration of 10 μM. However, when we solved the crystal structure of SEWN0.1 at 1.9 Å, we observed a dimer in a conformation incompatible with binding Gα q . Unintentionally, we had designed a protein that adopts alternate conformations depending on its oligomeric state. Recently, there has been tremendous progress in the field of protein structure prediction as new methods in artificial intelligence have been used to predict structures with high accuracy. We were curious if the structure prediction method AlphaFold could predict the structure of SEWN0.1 and if the prediction depended on oligomeric state. When AlphaFold was used to predict the structure of monomeric SEWN0.1, it produced a model that resembles the Rosetta design model and is compatible with binding Gα q , but when used to predict the structure of a dimer, it predicted a conformation that closely resembles the SEWN0.1 crystal structure. AlphaFold's ability to predict multiple conformations for a single protein sequence should be useful for engineering protein switches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4368

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cummins, M. C., Jacobs, T. M., Teets, F. D., DiMaio, F., Tripathy, A., & Kuhlman, B.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhlman, Brian
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-20
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
e4368-e4368
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4283167332
Cited by
15
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM131923, T32GM007040)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
AlphaFold, de novo protein design, oligomeric state, protein conformational polymorphism, protein dimerization, protein switches
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Artificial Intelligence, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review