Cited by 296vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models

Open access
Clifford, Joakim Nøddeskov, Høie, Magnus Haraldson, Deleuran, Sebastian, Peters, Bjoern, Nielsen, Morten, Marcatili, Paolo·2022·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

B‐cell epitope prediction tools are of great medical and commercial interest due to their practical applications in vaccine development and disease diagnostics. The introduction of protein language models (LMs), trained on unprecedented large datasets of protein sequences and structures, tap into a powerful numeric representation that can be exploited to accurately predict local and global protein structural features from amino acid sequences only. In this paper, we present BepiPred‐3.0, a sequence‐based epitope prediction tool that, by exploiting LM embeddings, greatly improves the prediction accuracy for both linear and conformational epitope prediction on several independent test sets. Furthermore, by carefully selecting additional input variables and epitope residue annotation strategy, performance was further improved, thus achieving unprecedented predictive power. Our tool can predict epitopes across hundreds of sequences in minutes. It is freely available as a web server and a standalone package at https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?BepiPred-3.0 with a user‐friendly interface to navigate the results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4497

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Clifford, J. N., Høie, M. H., Deleuran, S., Peters, B., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US)
Corresponding author
Clifford, Joakim Nøddeskov
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-22
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
e4497-e4497
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4308773001
Cited by
296
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 3
FWCI
16.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
B-cell epitope prediction, protein language models, linear epitopes, conformational epitopes, sequence-based prediction, vaccine development, web server
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Language, Epitope Mapping, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review