Cited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Mutational scan inferred binding energetics and structure in intrinsically disordered protein CcdA

Open access
Chandra, Soumyanetra, Manjunath, Kavyashree, Asok, Aparna, Varadarajan, Raghavan·2023·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Unlike globular proteins, mutational effects on the function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) are not well‐studied. Deep Mutational Scanning of a yeast surface displayed mutant library yields insights into sequence‐function relationships in the CcdA IDP. The approach enables facile prediction of interface residues and local structural signatures of the bound conformation. In contrast to previous titration‐based approaches which use a number of ligand concentrations, we show that use of a single rationally chosen ligand concentration can provide quantitative estimates of relative binding constants for large numbers of protein variants. This is because the extended interface of IDP ensures that energetic effects of point mutations are spread over a much smaller range than for globular proteins. Our data also provides insights into the much‐debated role of helicity and disorder in partner binding of IDPs. Based on this exhaustive mutational sensitivity dataset, a rudimentary model was developed in an attempt to predict mutational effects on binding affinity of IDPs that form alpha‐helical structures upon binding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4580

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chandra, S., Manjunath, K., Asok, A., & Varadarajan, R.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (IN)
Corresponding author
Varadarajan, Raghavan
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-24
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
e4580-e4580
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4318474348
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science and Engineering Research Board (EMR/2017/0040S4, SR/S2/JCB‐10/2007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, CcdA, deep mutational scanning, protein-ligand binding affinity, binding energetics, alpha-helix formation, sequence-function relationships, yeast surface display, point mutations
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical, Ligands, Mutation, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review