Cited by 6Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysProtein Structure and DynamicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of affinity between p53 transactivation domain and MDM2 across the animal kingdom demonstrates high plasticity of motif‐mediated interactions

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The interaction between the transcription factor p53 and the ubiquitin ligase MDM2 results in the degradation of p53 and is well‐studied in cancer biology and drug development. Available sequence data suggest that both p53 and MDM2‐family proteins are present across the animal kingdom. However, the interacting regions are missing in some animal groups, and it is not clear whether MDM2 interacts with, and regulates p53 in all species. We used phylogenetic analyses and biophysical measurements to examine the evolution of affinity between the interacting protein regions: a conserved 12‐residue intrinsically disordered binding motif in the p53 transactivation domain (TAD) and the folded SWIB domain of MDM2. The affinity varied significantly across the animal kingdom. The p53TAD/MDM2 interaction among jawed vertebrates displayed high affinity, in particular for chicken and human proteins ( K D around 0.1 μM). The affinity of the bay mussel p53TAD/MDM2 complex was lower ( K D = 15 μM) and those from a placozoan, an arthropod, and a jawless vertebrate were very low or non‐detectable ( K D > 100 μM). Binding experiments with reconstructed ancestral p53TAD/MDM2 variants suggested that a micromolar affinity interaction was present in the ancestral bilaterian animal and was later enhanced in tetrapods while lost in other linages. The different evolutionary trajectories of p53TAD/MDM2 affinity during speciation demonstrate high plasticity of motif‐mediated interactions and the potential for rapid adaptation of p53 regulation during times of change. Neutral drift in unconstrained disordered regions may underlie the plasticity and explain the observed low sequence conservation in TADs such as p53TAD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4684

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b03876 · DOI
  2. 10.1186/s12862-017-1023-y · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80627-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/molbev/msp277 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/onc.2015.57 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/gad.274118.115 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/molbev/msw223 · DOI
  11. EvansR O'NeillM PritzelA AntropovaN SeniorA GreenT et al.Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold‐Multimer.bioRxiv.2021https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.0811023106 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fersht A, 1999, Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding
  14. 10.1038/ng1530 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00813 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature02555 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrg3540 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1903077116 · DOI
  20. 10.7554/eLife.16059 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.mod.2018.05.007 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/sciadv.aau4130 · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014710 · DOI
  24. Joerger AC, 2014, Tracing the evolution of the p53 tetramerization domain, Struct Lond Engl 1993, 22, 1301
  25. 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167643 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1814051115 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/molbev/msn222 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.274.5289.948 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.4161/cc.9.3.10516 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1947601912458285 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01319-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/molbev/msaa198 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210695 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41568-020-0262-1 · DOI
  35. 10.1242/jcs.113.10.1661 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/chem.202203369 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.04.006 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41467-023-38015-5 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2010.04.008 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.05.055 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nature06967 · DOI
  43. 10.3390/cells10010025 · DOI
  44. 10.1186/s13062-021-00307-5 · DOI
  45. 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9278 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.7554/eLife.68068 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00852-5 · DOI
  48. 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F31 · DOI
  49. 10.1074/jbc.M202296200 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/15384101.2014.998056 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/ja800201j · DOI
  52. 10.1038/srep33972 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.07.003 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/ng.2568 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.cels.2022.01.002 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41559-023-02018-8 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.2021456118 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/jmcb/mjx002 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/onc.2009.71 · DOI
  60. 10.1073/pnas.0702010104 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032 · DOI
  62. 10.1073/pnas.0307968100 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.11.012 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.029 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nrm3920 · DOI
  66. 10.1073/pnas.1614787114 · DOI
  67. 10.4161/cc.9.22.13871 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/s41419-022-04653-8 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mihalič, F., Åberg, E., Farkhondehkish, P., Theys, N., Andersson, E., & Jemth, P.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Jemth, Per
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-28
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
e4684-e4684
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4377195588
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2015.0069)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2020‐04395)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
p53, MDM2, p53 transactivation domain, protein-protein interaction affinity, intrinsically disordered regions, protein evolution, ancestral protein reconstruction, jawless fishes, placozoans, arthropods, neutral drift, p53 regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Phylogeny, Protein Binding, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review