The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of affinity between p53 transactivation domain and MDM2 across the animal kingdom demonstrates high plasticity of motif‐mediated interactions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The interaction between the transcription factor p53 and the ubiquitin ligase MDM2 results in the degradation of p53 and is well‐studied in cancer biology and drug development. Available sequence data suggest that both p53 and MDM2‐family proteins are present across the animal kingdom. However, the interacting regions are missing in some animal groups, and it is not clear whether MDM2 interacts with, and regulates p53 in all species. We used phylogenetic analyses and biophysical measurements to examine the evolution of affinity between the interacting protein regions: a conserved 12‐residue intrinsically disordered binding motif in the p53 transactivation domain (TAD) and the folded SWIB domain of MDM2. The affinity varied significantly across the animal kingdom. The p53TAD/MDM2 interaction among jawed vertebrates displayed high affinity, in particular for chicken and human proteins ( K D around 0.1 μM). The affinity of the bay mussel p53TAD/MDM2 complex was lower ( K D = 15 μM) and those from a placozoan, an arthropod, and a jawless vertebrate were very low or non‐detectable ( K D > 100 μM). Binding experiments with reconstructed ancestral p53TAD/MDM2 variants suggested that a micromolar affinity interaction was present in the ancestral bilaterian animal and was later enhanced in tetrapods while lost in other linages. The different evolutionary trajectories of p53TAD/MDM2 affinity during speciation demonstrate high plasticity of motif‐mediated interactions and the potential for rapid adaptation of p53 regulation during times of change. Neutral drift in unconstrained disordered regions may underlie the plasticity and explain the observed low sequence conservation in TADs such as p53TAD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity
Bourdon, J.-C., Fernandes, K., Murray-Zmijewski, F., Liu, G., Diot, A., Xirodimas, D. P., Saville, M. K., & Lane, D. P. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1339905 · Cited by 810
Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution
McLysaght, A., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng884 · Cited by 530
Interactions by disorder – A matter of context
Bugge, K., Brakti, I., Fernandes, C. B., Dreier, J. E., Lundsgaard, J. E., Olsen, J. G., Skriver, K., & Kragelund, B. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00110 · Cited by 155
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b03876 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12862-017-1023-y · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80627-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msp277 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/onc.2015.57 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.274118.115 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msw223 · DOI
- EvansR O'NeillM PritzelA AntropovaN SeniorA GreenT et al.Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold‐Multimer.bioRxiv.2021https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0811023106 · DOI · Paper page
- Fersht A, 1999, Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding
- 10.1038/ng1530 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00813 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02555 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg3540 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1903077116 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.16059 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mod.2018.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aau4130 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014710 · DOI
- Joerger AC, 2014, Tracing the evolution of the p53 tetramerization domain, Struct Lond Engl 1993, 22, 1301
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167643 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1814051115 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msn222 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.274.5289.948 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/cc.9.3.10516 · DOI
- 10.1177/1947601912458285 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01319-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa198 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1210695 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41568-020-0262-1 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.113.10.1661 · DOI
- 10.1002/chem.202203369 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-38015-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cbpb.2010.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2004.05.055 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06967 · DOI
- 10.3390/cells10010025 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13062-021-00307-5 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9278 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.68068 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00852-5 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F31 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M202296200 · DOI
- 10.1080/15384101.2014.998056 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja800201j · DOI
- 10.1038/srep33972 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.2568 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cels.2022.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41559-023-02018-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2021456118 · DOI
- 10.1093/jmcb/mjx002 · DOI
- 10.1038/onc.2009.71 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0702010104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0307968100 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.029 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm3920 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1614787114 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.9.22.13871 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41419-022-04653-8 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Mihalič, F., Åberg, E., Farkhondehkish, P., Theys, N., Andersson, E., & Jemth, P.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Jemth, Per
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-06-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e4684-e4684
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC10303687
- OpenAlex
- W4377195588
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2015.0069)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2020‐04395)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- p53, MDM2, p53 transactivation domain, protein-protein interaction affinity, intrinsically disordered regions, protein evolution, ancestral protein reconstruction, jawless fishes, placozoans, arthropods, neutral drift, p53 regulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Phylogeny, Protein Binding, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review