Cited by 11Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

IFF : Identifying key residues in intrinsically disordered regions of proteins using machine learning

Open access
Ho, Wen‐Lin, Huang, Hsuan‐Cheng, Huang, Jie‐rong·2023·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Conserved residues in protein homolog sequence alignments are structurally or functionally important. For intrinsically disordered proteins or proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), however, alignment often fails because they lack a steric structure to constrain evolution. Although sequences vary, the physicochemical features of IDRs may be preserved in maintaining function. Therefore, a method to retrieve common IDR features may help identify functionally important residues. We applied unsupervised contrastive learning to train a model with self‐attention neuronal networks on human IDR orthologs. Parameters in the model were trained to match sequences in ortholog pairs but not in other IDRs. The trained model successfully identifies previously reported critical residues from experimental studies, especially those with an overall pattern (e.g., multiple aromatic residues or charged blocks) rather than short motifs. This predictive model can be used to identify potentially important residues in other proteins, improving our understanding of their functions. The trained model can be run directly from the Jupyter Notebook in the GitHub repository using Binder ( mybinder.org ). The only required input is the primary sequence. The training scripts are available on GitHub ( https://github.com/allmwh/IFF ). The training datasets have been deposited in an Open Science Framework repository ( https://osf.io/jk29b ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4739

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ho, W., Huang, H., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jie‐rong
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-22
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
e4739-e4739
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4385295567
Cited by
11
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Technology Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
intrinsically disordered regions, conserved residues, residue identification, orthologs, contrastive learning, self-attention, protein function, physicochemical properties, critical residues
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Sequence Alignment, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review