Cited by 374Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

End-to-End Differentiable Learning of Protein Structure

Open access
AlQuraishi, Mohammed·2019·Cell Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Predicting protein structure from sequence is a central challenge of biochemistry. Co-evolution methods show promise, but an explicit sequence-to-structure map remains elusive. Advances in deep learning that replace complex, human-designed pipelines with differentiable models optimized end to end suggest the potential benefits of similarly reformulating structure prediction. Here, we introduce an end-to-end differentiable model for protein structure learning. The model couples local and global protein structure via geometric units that optimize global geometry without violating local covalent chemistry. We test our model using two challenging tasks: predicting novel folds without co-evolutionary data and predicting known folds without structural templates. In the first task, the model achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, and in the second, it comes within 1-2 Å; competing methods using co-evolution and experimental templates have been refined over many years, and it is likely that the differentiable approach has substantial room for further improvement, with applications ranging from drug discovery to protein design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.006

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning-based structure prediction methods explicitly incorporate constraints on protein geometries.

    “significant work has been done in the opposite direction of machine learning-based structure prediction methods that explicitly incorporate constraints on protein geometries 3,5,26,87-89.”
  • End-to-end differentiable coordinate generation for protein structures was first demonstrated in the Recurrent Geometric Network.

    “The process of end-to-end differentiable coordinate generation for protein structures, where atomic coordinates are produced as a direct output of a neural network, was first demonstrated in the Recurrent Geometric Network (18)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aydin Z, Thompson J, Bilmes J, Baker D, and Noble WS (2012). Protein Torsion Angle Class Prediction by a Hybrid Architecture of Bayesian and Neural Networks In 13th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, p.
  2. Gajda MJ, Pawlowski M, and Bujnicki JM (2011b). Multiscale Approaches to Protein Modeling (New York, NY: Springer New York).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AlQuraishi, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
AlQuraishi, Mohammed
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
292-301.e3
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952317511
Cited by
371
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
20.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NVIDIA
  • NIGMS (P50GM107618)
  • NCI (U54-CA225088)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure prediction, differentiable models, coevolution, protein design
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Software, Protein Folding, Evolution, Molecular, Sequence Analysis, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review