Cited by 11Protein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The intrinsically disordered transcriptional activation domain of CIITA is functionally tuneable by single substitutions: An exception or a new paradigm?

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

During protein evolution, some amino acid substitutions modulate protein function (“tuneability”). In most proteins, the tuneable range is wide and can be sampled by a set of protein variants that each contains multiple amino acid substitutions. In other proteins, the full tuneable range can be accessed by a set of variants that each contains a single substitution. Indeed, in some globular proteins, the full tuneable range can be accessed by the set of site‐saturating substitutions at an individual “rheostat” position. However, in proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), most functional studies—which would also detect tuneability—used multiple substitutions or small deletions. In disordered transcriptional activation domains (ADs), studies with multiple substitutions led to the “acidic exposure” model, which does not anticipate the existence of rheostat positions. In the few studies that did assess effects of single substitutions on AD function, results were mixed: the ADs of two full‐length transcription factors did not show tuneability, whereas a fragment of a third AD was tuneable by single substitutions. In this study, we tested tuneability in the AD of full‐length human class II transactivator (CIITA). Sequence analyses and experiments showed that CIITA's AD is an IDR. Functional assays of singly‐substituted AD variants showed that CIITA's function was highly tuneable, with outcomes not predicted by the acidic exposure model. Four tested positions showed rheostat behavior for transcriptional activation. Thus, tuneability of different IDRs can vary widely. Future studies are needed to illuminate the biophysical features that govern whether an IDR is tuneable by single substitutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.4863

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1101/2020.11.17.386979 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/1471-2105-15-82 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/j100308a038 · DOI
  5. 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nature21705 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkq1217 · DOI
  8. 10.1074/jbc.M106301200 · DOI
  9. 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.1163 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/molbev/msaa202 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41467-023-38519-0 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/pro.4496 · DOI
  15. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00476 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/srep02076 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.01.030 · DOI
  18. EmeneckerRJ GriffithD HolehouseAS.Metapredict V2: an update to metapredict a fast accurate and easy‐to‐use predictor of consensus disorder and structure. bioRxiv.2022https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.06.494887 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkab408 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.020 · DOI
  21. 10.1186/s13059-019-1845-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00044-020-02582-9 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkr367 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/nar/25.12.2522 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/MCB.19.1.941 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90016-X · DOI
  27. 10.1128/MCB.20.20.7716-7725.2000 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  30. HockneyRW.The potential calculation and some applications.1970;9:135–211.
  31. 10.1002/humu.23616 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/bi301341r · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41467-021-24773-7 · DOI
  34. Hu X, 2023, Nuclear condensates of YAP fusion proteins alter transcription to drive ependymoma tumourigenesis, Nat Cell Biol, 25, 323
  35. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkq1105 · DOI
  37. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167643 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.3390/molecules180910802 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkab975 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.M104798200 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/jz402729x · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.3390/ijms22031074 · DOI
  46. 10.1074/jbc.M112.355651 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/prot.22711 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/tpj.12933 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/ng.3700 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1002/prot.25953 · DOI
  51. 10.1101/gad.14.9.1156 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/nar/gks806 · DOI
  53. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083502 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/srep41329 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
  56. 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5019-5026.2002 · DOI
  57. 10.1080/00268978400101201 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77529-0 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/pro.4336 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/emboj/21.8.1978 · DOI
  61. 10.1021/jp508971m · DOI
  62. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00075 · DOI
  63. 10.1021/jacs.0c03217 · DOI
  64. 10.2165/00822942-200403020-00005 · DOI
  65. 10.1074/jbc.M205051200 · DOI
  66. 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014889 · DOI
  67. 10.7554/eLife.68068 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/nar/gkab1112 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6330 · DOI
  70. 10.1128/JVI.80.9.4276-4285.2006 · DOI
  71. 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1409 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.034 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.cels.2018.01.015 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.cels.2022.01.002 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80090-X · DOI
  77. 10.1002/pro.4136 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/humu.23239 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/humu.23231 · DOI
  80. 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9188 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02169-2 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05183.x · DOI
  83. 10.1038/s41598-019-53464-z · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.01.011 · DOI
  85. 10.1002/pro.3680 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.coi.2004.11.008 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sreenivasan, S., Heffren, P., Suh, K., Rodnin, M. V., Kosa, E., Fenton, A. W., Ladokhin, A. S., Smith, P. E., Fontes, J. D., & Swint‐Kruse, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Swint‐Kruse, Liskin
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-24
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
e4863-e4863
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4389570183
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM118589, GM147635)
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
intrinsically disordered regions, transactivation domain, CIITA, single amino acid substitution, transcriptional activation, protein evolution
MeSH terms
Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Transcriptional Activation, Trans-Activators, Amino Acid Substitution, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review