Cited by 3Protein Structure and DynamicsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved prediction of site‐rates from structure with averaging across homologs

Open access
Norn, Christoffer, Oliveira, Fábio, André, Ingemar·2024·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Variation in mutation rates at sites in proteins can largely be understood by the constraint that proteins must fold into stable structures. Models that calculate site‐specific rates based on protein structure and a thermodynamic stability model have shown a significant but modest ability to predict empirical site‐specific rates calculated from sequence. Models that use detailed atomistic models of protein energetics do not outperform simpler approaches using packing density. We demonstrate that a fundamental reason for this is that empirical site‐specific rates are the result of the average effect of many different microenvironments in a phylogeny. By analyzing the results of evolutionary dynamics simulations, we show how averaging site‐specific rates across many extant protein structures can lead to correct recovery of site‐rate prediction. This result is also demonstrated in natural protein sequences and experimental structures. Using predicted structures, we demonstrate that atomistic models can improve upon contact density metrics in predicting site‐specific rates from a structure. The results give fundamental insights into the factors governing the distribution of site‐specific rates in protein families.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.5086

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/molbev/msy244 · DOI
  5. 10.1088/1478-3975/12/2/025002 · DOI
  6. Echave J, 2016, Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites, Nat Rev Genet, 17, 121
  7. 10.1093/molbev/msp146 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046602 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/bi00181a032 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.032522499 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1314045110 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/molbev/msn067 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/prot.21983 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.7717/peerj.911 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167538 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1903888116 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059004 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010262 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/pro.4155 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1913071117 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1120084109 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S71 · DOI
  29. 10.1534/genetics.111.128025 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/1471-2148-12-179 · DOI
  31. 10.1073/pnas.1412933112 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/prot.24058 · DOI
  33. 10.7717/peerj.4339 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/pro.2897 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-222 · DOI
  38. 10.12688/f1000research.12874.1 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/pro.3406 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020069 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Norn, C., Oliveira, F., & André, I.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology Lund University Lund Sweden
Corresponding author
André, Ingemar
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-25
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
e5086-e5086
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4400017307
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein evolution, protein structure, thermodynamic stability, packing density, contact density, protein microenvironment, protein families
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Evolution, Molecular, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review