The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved prediction of site‐rates from structure with averaging across homologs
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Variation in mutation rates at sites in proteins can largely be understood by the constraint that proteins must fold into stable structures. Models that calculate site‐specific rates based on protein structure and a thermodynamic stability model have shown a significant but modest ability to predict empirical site‐specific rates calculated from sequence. Models that use detailed atomistic models of protein energetics do not outperform simpler approaches using packing density. We demonstrate that a fundamental reason for this is that empirical site‐specific rates are the result of the average effect of many different microenvironments in a phylogeny. By analyzing the results of evolutionary dynamics simulations, we show how averaging site‐specific rates across many extant protein structures can lead to correct recovery of site‐rate prediction. This result is also demonstrated in natural protein sequences and experimental structures. Using predicted structures, we demonstrate that atomistic models can improve upon contact density metrics in predicting site‐specific rates from a structure. The results give fundamental insights into the factors governing the distribution of site‐specific rates in protein families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msy244 · DOI
- 10.1088/1478-3975/12/2/025002 · DOI
- Echave J, 2016, Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites, Nat Rev Genet, 17, 121
- 10.1093/molbev/msp146 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0046602 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00181a032 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.032522499 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1314045110 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msn067 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21983 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7717/peerj.911 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167538 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1903888116 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059004 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010262 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4155 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1913071117 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1120084109 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S71 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.111.128025 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2148-12-179 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1412933112 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24058 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.4339 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.2897 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-222 · DOI
- 10.12688/f1000research.12874.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3406 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020069 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Norn, C., Oliveira, F., & André, I.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology Lund University Lund Sweden
- Corresponding author
- André, Ingemar
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-06-25
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e5086-e5086
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC11196898
- OpenAlex
- W4400017307
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- protein evolution, protein structure, thermodynamic stability, packing density, contact density, protein microenvironment, protein families
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Evolution, Molecular, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review