Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Open accessAbstract
DeepMind presented remarkably accurate protein structure predictions at the CASP14 conference. We explored network architectures incorporating related ideas and obtained the best performance with a 3-track network in which information at the 1D sequence level, the 2D distance map level, and the 3D coordinate level is successively transformed and integrated. The 3-track network produces structure predictions with accuracies approaching those of DeepMind in CASP14, enables rapid solution of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM structure modeling problems, and provides insights into the functions of proteins of currently unknown structure. The network also enables rapid generation of accurate models of protein-protein complexes from sequence information alone, short circuiting traditional approaches which require modeling of individual subunits followed by docking. We make the method available to the scientific community to speed biological research. One-Sentence Summary: Accurate protein structure modeling enables rapid solution of structure determination problems and provides insights into biological function.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
RoseTTAFold is a 3-track neural network that integrates 1D sequence, 2D distance-map, and 3D coordinate information to predict protein structures and interactions. It approaches AlphaFold2 accuracy in CASP14, solves challenging crystallography and cryo-EM modeling problems, and generates protein-complex models directly from sequence.
Key findings
- In CASP14, the 3-track RoseTTAFold outperformed the top 2 server groups (Zhang-server and BAKER-ROSETTASERVER), the BAKER human group, and the authors’ 2-track models, though its performance was still not as good as AlphaFold2.
- On CAMEO, over 69 medium and hard targets released May 15–June 19, 2021, RoseTTAFold outperformed all other evaluated servers, including Robetta, IntFold6-TS, BestSingleTemplate, and SWISS-MODEL.
- RoseTTAFold models enabled molecular-replacement solutions for four previously unsolved crystallographic datasets; for the cryo-EM p101 Gβγ binding domain, the Cα-RMSD between predicted and refined structure was 3.0 Å over the beta-sheets.
- Among 693 domains from human disease-related proteins, over one-third had predicted lDDT > 0.8, corresponding to an average Cα-RMSD of 2.6 Å on CASP14 targets; many protein-complex models had TM-score > 0.8, with complex generation taking ~30 min on a 24G TITAN RTX GPU.
Methods
- The 3-track network transforms and integrates information at the 1D sequence/MSA level, the 2D distance/orientation-map level, and the 3D backbone-coordinate level, with information flowing between tracks; training used discontinuous sequence crops spanning 260 residues.
- Final 3D structures were generated either by feeding predicted distance/orientation distributions into pyRosetta for all-atom models or by an end-to-end SE(3)-equivariant layer producing backbone coordinates directly.
- Evaluation included CASP14 targets, CAMEO blind server assessment, four X-ray molecular-replacement datasets, a cryo-EM PI3Kγ complex, GPCRs, 693 human disease-related domains, and paired-sequence complexes of known structure, using accuracy comparisons, Cα-RMSD, lDDT, TM-score, and MR/cryo-EM fit.
Limitations
- Stated: hardware memory limitations constrained model size and training; performance remained below AlphaFold2; the end-to-end version was less accurate than the pyRosetta version due to incomplete optimization and neglect of side-chain information; the accuracy predictor did not consistently identify models better than the rapid single-pass method; the network was trained on monomeric proteins, not complexes; and current RoseTTAFold uses only the top 1000 sequences due to memory limits.
- Stated: the Perceiver-based extension for using all available sequences gave promising initial results, but more training is required for rigorous comparison.
- Evident: CASP14 and CAMEO evaluations cover limited target sets and time windows, and the end-to-end model does not produce side chains.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
13 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Deep learning methods such as AlphaFold and trRosetta, which extract information from the PDB, outperform traditional approaches that explicitly model the folding process.
“The bi-annual Critical Assessment of Structure (CASP) meetings have demonstrated that deep learning methods such as AlphaFold (1, 2) and trRosetta (3), that extract information from the large database of known protein structures in the PDB, outperform more traditional approaches that explicitly model the folding process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] John Jumper , Richard Evans , Alexander Pritzel , Tim Green , Michael Figurnov , Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool , Olaf Ronneberger , Russ Bates , Augustin Žídek , Alex Bridgland , Clemens Meyer , Simon A A Kohl , Anna Potapenko , Andrew J Ballard , Andrew Cowie , Bernardino Romera-Paredes , Stanislav Nikolov , Rishub Jain , Jonas Adler , Trevor Back , Stig Petersen , David Reiman , Martin Steinegger , Michalina Pacholska , David Silver , Oriol Vinyals , Andrew W Senior , Koray Kavukcuoglu , Pushmeet Kohli , Demis Hassabis ., in Fourteenth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Predic
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2] source
The Introduction (page not provided) says deep networks improved protein-structure prediction accuracy, notes an AlphaFold observation at CASP13, and reports that trRosetta outperformed other methods in benchmark tests. The Conclusion says the network learned from native protein structures and contrasts it with physically based approaches. The paper does not establish the claimed CASP comparison in which both AlphaFold and trRosetta outperform approaches that explicitly model folding. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [3] source
- Findingcitation
The RoseTTAFold CERS1 model for residues 98 to 304 (Pfam TLC domain) includes six transmembrane helices that traverse the membrane in an up and down arrangement.
“The RoseTTAFold CERS1 model for residues 98 to 304 (Pfam TLC domain) (29) includes six TMH that traverse the membrane in an up and down arrangement (Fig. 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) describes coevolution-based protein interaction models in E. coli and M. tuberculosis, not a CERS1 model. Searches for CERS1, the Pfam TLC domain, RoseTTAFold, and six transmembrane helices found no passage in our copy addressing the cited domain identification or the stated membrane arrangement. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
For SLP, only a distant model covering part of the N-terminal domain (38% of the sequence) was available in the PDB.
“in the case of SLP, only a distant model covering part of the N-terminal domain (38% of the sequence) was available in the PDB”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
trRosetta failed to predict the correct fold for the p101 Gβγ binding domain with the same MSA input.
“trRosetta failed to predict the correct fold with the same MSA input (fig. S6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 3-track models with attention at the 1D, 2D, and 3D levels clearly outperformed the top 2 server groups, the BAKER human group, and the 2-track attention models on CASP14 targets.
“The 3-track models with attention operating at the 1D, 2D, and 3D levels and information flowing between the three levels were the best models we tested (Fig. 1B), clearly outperforming the top 2 server groups (Zhang-server and BAKER-ROSETTASERVER), BAKER human group (ranked second among all groups), and our 2-track attention models on CASP14 targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The accuracy predictor was not able to consistently identify models better than those generated by the rapid single pass method.
“the accuracy predictor was not able to consistently identify models better than those generated by the rapid single pass method (fig. S3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The RoseTTAFold predicted structure of the p101 Gβγ binding domain could readily fit into the electron density map despite low local resolution.
“The predicted structure could readily fit into the electron density map despite the low local resolution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The network enables rapid generation of accurate protein-protein complex models from sequence information alone, short circuiting traditional approaches requiring modeling of individual subunits followed by docking.
“The network also enables rapid generation of accurate protein-protein complex models from sequence information alone, short circuiting traditional approaches which require modeling of individual subunits followed by docking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The 3-track network provides insights into the functions of proteins of currently unknown structure.
“provides insights into the functions of proteins of currently unknown structure”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In each of the four molecular replacement cases, the closest homolog of the known structure was a much poorer model than the RoseTTAFold model.
“The images in Fig. 2A and fig. S5 show that in each case, the closest homolog of the known structure was a much poorer model than the RoseTTAFold model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The RoseTTAFold predicted structure of the ADAM33 prodomain has a lipocalin-like beta-barrel fold belonging to an extended superfamily that includes metalloprotease inhibitors (MPIs).
“The RoseTTAFold predicted structure of the ADAM33 prodomain has a lipocalin-like beta-barrel fold (Fig. 3C) belonging to an extended superfamily that includes metalloprotease inhibitors (MPIs) (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] 2021, Ceramide synthases: Reflections on the impact of Dr, Lina M. Obeid. Cell. Signal source
- Findingown data
The correlation between multiple sequence alignment depth and model accuracy is lower for RoseTTAFold than for trRosetta and other methods tested at CASP14.
“As in the case of AlphaFold2, the correlation between multiple sequence alignment depth and model accuracy is lower for RoseTTAFold than for trRosetta and other methods tested at CASP14 (fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 3-track network, integrating 1D sequence, 2D distance map, and 3D coordinate information, produced the best performance among the explored network architectures.
“We explored network architectures incorporating related ideas and obtained the best performance with a 3-track network in which information at the 1D sequence level, the 2D distance map level, and the 3D coordinate level is successively transformed and integrated.”
- Also stated in: § Network architecture development · boosted
“The 3-track models with attention operating at the 1D, 2D, and 3D levels and information flowing between the three levels were the best models we tested (Fig. 1B), clearly outperforming the top 2 server groups (Zhang-server and BAKER-ROSETTASERVER), BAKER human group (ranked second among all groups), and our 2-track attention models on CASP14 targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Network architecture development · boosted
- Findingown data
Combining predictions from multiple discontinuous crops generated more accurate structures than predicting the entire structure at once.
“In developing RoseTTAFold, we found that combining predictions from multiple discontinuous crops generated more accurate structures than predicting the entire structure at once (fig. S4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In all four cases, the predicted RoseTTAFold models had sufficient structural similarity to the true structures to lead to successful molecular replacement solutions.
“In all four cases, the predicted models had sufficient structural similarity to the true structures that led to successful MR solutions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Four recent crystallographic datasets that had eluded solution by molecular replacement using models available in the PDB were reanalyzed using RoseTTAFold models.
“Four recent crystallographic datasets (summarized, including resolution limits, in table S2), which had eluded solution by MR using models available in the PDB, were reanalyzed using RoseTTAFold models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Cα-RMSD between the predicted and final refined structure of the p101 Gβγ binding domain is 3.0 Å over the beta-sheets.
“The Cα-RMSD between the predicted and the final refined structure is 3.0 Å over the beta-sheets (Fig. 2C, bottom).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The 3-track network enables the rapid solution of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM structure modeling problems.
“enables the rapid solution of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM structure modeling problems”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The DeepAccNet model quality predictor provides a good measure of actual model accuracy.
“the DeepAccNet model quality predictor (12) provides a good measure of actual model accuracy (fig. S7D)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] 2006, TANGOing along the protein secretion pathway, Genome Biol
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
A homology model based on very distant (<15% sequence identity) homologs had multiple alignment shifts that misplace key conserved residues.
“By comparison, a homology model based on very distant (<15% sequence identity) homologs had multiple alignment shifts that misplace key conserved residues (fig. S9 and table S3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The 3-track network produces structure predictions with accuracies approaching those of DeepMind in CASP14.
“The 3-track network produces structure predictions with accuracies approaching those of DeepMind in CASP14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A two-track network with parallel 1D sequence alignment and 2D distance matrix tracks performed considerably better than trRosetta.
“We succeeded in producing a “two-track” network with information flowing in parallel along a 1D sequence alignment track and a 2D distance matrix track with considerably better performance than trRosetta (BAKER-ROSETTASERVER and BAKER in Fig. 1B), the next best method after AlphaFold2 in CASP14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The performance of the 3-track model on the CASP14 targets was still not as good as AlphaFold2.
“The performance of the 3-track model on the CASP14 targets was still not as good as AlphaFold2 (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More accurate complex structures were generated when more sequences were available.
“Information on residue-residue co-evolution between the paired sequences likely contributes to the accuracy of the rigid body placement as more accurate complex structures were generated when more sequences were available (fig. S10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites fig. S10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The RoseTTAFold model fits the experimental cryo-EM density well.
“The RoseTTAFold model fits the experimental cryo-EM density well and identified a shared interaction between Y189 in IL-12p35 and G115 in IL-12Rβ2 analogous to the packing between W156 in IL-23p19 with G116 in IL-23R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Complex models are generated from sequence information in ~30 min on a 24G TITAN RTX GPU.
“In addition to the great reduction in compute time required (complex models are generated from sequence information in ~30 min on a 24G TITAN RTX GPU), this approach implements “flexible backbone” docking almost by construction as the structures of the chains are predicted in the context of each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The RoseTTAFold model identified a shared interaction between Y189 in IL-12p35 and G115 in IL-12Rβ2 analogous to the packing between W156 in IL-23p19 with G116 in IL-23R.
“The RoseTTAFold model fits the experimental cryo-EM density well and identified a shared interaction between Y189 in IL-12p35 and G115 in IL-12Rβ2 analogous to the packing between W156 in IL-23p19 with G116 in IL-23R.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
DeepMind presented remarkably accurate predictions at the CASP14 protein structure prediction assessment conference.
“DeepMind presented remarkably accurate predictions at the recent CASP14 protein structure prediction assessment conference.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
“The outstanding performance of DeepMind’s AlphaFold2 in the recent CASP14 meeting (https://predictioncenter.org/casp14/zscores_final.cgi) left the scientific community eager to learn details beyond the overall framework presented and raised the question of whether such accuracy could be achieved outside of a world-leading deep learning company.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://predictioncenter.org/casp14/zscores_final.cgi
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
- Premisecitation
AlphaFold2 replaced 2D convolution with an attention mechanism that better represents interactions between residues distant along the sequence.
“replacement of 2D convolution with an attention mechanism that better represents interactions between residues distant along the sequence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CASP14 conference
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Extending to a third track operating in 3D coordinate space could achieve better performance by providing a tighter connection between sequence, residue-residue distances and orientations, and atomic coordinates.
“We reasoned that better performance could be achieved by extending to a third track operating in 3D coordinate space to provide a tighter connection between sequence, residue-residue distances and orientations, and atomic coordinates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AlphaFold2 used end-to-end learning in which all network parameters are optimized by backpropagation from the final generated 3D coordinates through all network layers back to the input sequence.
“end-to-end learning in which all network parameters are optimized by backpropagation from the final generated 3D coordinates through all network layers back to the input sequence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CASP14 conference
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Ntn superfamily members with structures similar to the RoseTTAFold model suggest that TANGO2 functions as an enzyme that might hydrolyze a carbon-nitrogen bond in a membrane component.
“Ntn superfamily members with structures similar to the RoseTTAFold model suggest that TANGO2 functions as an enzyme that might hydrolyze a carbon-nitrogen bond in a membrane component (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
- Premisecitation
The per-residue error estimates by DeepAccNet allowed the more accurate parts of the models to be weighted more heavily.
“the per-residue error estimates by DeepAccNet (12) allowed the more accurate parts to be weighted more heavily”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] 2006, TANGOing along the protein secretion pathway, Genome Biol
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
RoseTTAFold enables solutions of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM modeling problems.
“RoseTTAFold enables solutions of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM modeling problems, provides insight into protein function in the absence of experimentally determined structures, and rapidly generates accurate models of protein-protein complexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The approach implements "flexible backbone" docking almost by construction because the structures of the chains are predicted in the context of each other.
“In addition to the great reduction in compute time required (complex models are generated from sequence information in ~30 min on a 24G TITAN RTX GPU), this approach implements “flexible backbone” docking almost by construction as the structures of the chains are predicted in the context of each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This active site composition (His182, Asp213, and potentially a neighboring Ser212) suggests testable reaction mechanisms for the enzyme.
“This active site composition (His182, Asp 213, and potentially a neighboring Ser212) suggests testable reaction mechanisms for the enzyme (Fig. 3F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
RoseTTAFold provides insight into protein function in the absence of experimentally determined structures.
“RoseTTAFold enables solutions of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM modeling problems, provides insight into protein function in the absence of experimentally determined structures, and rapidly generates accurate models of protein-protein complexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Information on residue-residue co-evolution between paired sequences likely contributes to the accuracy of rigid body placement.
“Information on residue-residue co-evolution between the paired sequences likely contributes to the accuracy of the rigid body placement as more accurate complex structures were generated when more sequences were available (fig. S10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 24
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRoseTTAFold has been evaluated since May 15th, 2021 on CAMEO; over the 69 medium and hard targets released during this time, it outperformed all other servers evaluated including Robetta, IntFold6-TS, BestSingleTemplate, and SWISS-MODEL.
“RoseTTAFold has been evaluated since May 15th, 2021 on CAMEO; over the 69 medium and hard targets released during this time (May 15th, 2021 ~ June 19th, 2021), it outperformed all other servers evaluated in the experiment including Robetta (3), IntFold6-TS (8), BestSingleTemplate (9), and SWISS-MODEL (10) (Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [3] source
- cites [8] 2021, GPCRdb in 2021: integrating GPCR sequence, structure and function, Nucleic Acids Res source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] 2020, Improving homology modeling from low-sequence identity templates in Rosetta: A case study in GPCRs, PLoS Comput. Biol source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] 2021, Improved protein structure refinement guided by deep learning based accuracy estimation, Nat. Commun source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO) experiment tests structure prediction servers blindly on protein structures as they are submitted to the PDB.
“Fortunately, the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO) experiment (7) tests structure prediction servers blindly on protein structures as they are submitted to the PDB.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
The Introduction discusses tools for finding protein-structure templates, and the Results’ Sensitivity benchmark describes tests using SCOP domains. Neither passage describes CAMEO or blind testing of prediction servers as structures are submitted to the PDB. Searches for CAMEO and for blind testing with PDB submissions found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBased on the model, known disease-causing mutations in TANGO2 could act by hindering catalysis (R26K, R32Q, and L50P, near active site) or produce steric clashes (G154R) in the hydrophobic core.
“Based on the model, known mutations that cause disease (magenta spheres in Fig. 3A) could act by hindering catalysis (R26K, R32Q, and L50P, near active site) or produce steric clashes (G154R) (19) in the hydrophobic core.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
The Structural analysis section describes a crystal model of VAP1, not a model of TANGO2. Searches for TANGO2, G154R, R26K, R32Q, and L50P found no passage addressing those mutations or the proposed effects on catalysis and the hydrophobic core. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeficiencies in TANGO2 lead to metabolic disorders, and the protein plays an unknown role in Golgi membrane redistribution into the ER.
“Deficiencies in TANGO2 (transport and Golgi organization protein 2) lead to metabolic disorders, and the protein plays an unknown role in Golgi membrane redistribution into the ER (16, 17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] source
- cites [17] 2019, A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase (ADAM) and ADAM with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) family in vascular biology and disease, Biochem. Pharmacol source
The ADAMTS Functions section discusses deficiencies and disorders involving ADAMTS proteins, not TANGO2. Searches for TANGO2 and for Golgi membrane redistribution into the ER found no passage in our copy addressing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ADAM and ADAMTS families of metalloproteases are encoded by over 40 human genes, mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, and are involved in a range of human diseases.
“The ADAM (A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease) and ADAMTS families of metalloproteases are encoded by over 40 human genes, mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions (20, 21) and are involved in a range of human diseases, including cancer metastasis, inflammatory disorders, neurological diseases and asthma (21, 22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] source
- cites [21] source
- cites [22] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies ADAM proteins as metalloproteases and discusses ADAM10 in relation to Alzheimer’s disease, supporting the neurological-disease example. Our copy does not state that the ADAM and ADAMTS families comprise over 40 human genes, mediate cell–cell or cell–matrix interactions, or are involved in the other listed diseases. Searches for those family-wide claims found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ADAMs contain prodomain and metalloprotease domains; the fold of the metalloprotease is known, but not that of the prodomain, which has no homologs of known structure.
“The ADAMs contain prodomain and metalloprotease domains; the fold of the metalloprotease is known (23, 24), but not that of the prodomain, which has no homologs of known structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBenchmark tests on GPCR sequences with determined structures showed that RoseTTAFold models for both active and inactive states can be quite accurate even in the absence of close homologs with known structures, and better than those in current GPCR model databases.
“Benchmark tests on GPCR sequences with determined structures showed that RoseTTAFold models for both active and inactive states can be quite accurate even in the absence of close homologs with known structures (and better than those in current GPCR model databases (14, 15); fig. S7)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] 2016, Recurrent Muscle Weakness with Rhabdomyolysis, Metabolic Crises, and Cardiac Arrhythmia Due to Bi-allelic TANGO2 Mutations, Am. J. Hum. Genet source
- cites [15] source
The cited paper’s Conclusions (p. 277) discuss the ADAM protein family and its possible functions. Searches of our copy for RoseTTAFold, GPCR structural models, and model databases found no passage addressing the benchmark or comparison claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA previously published cryo-EM map of the IL-12 receptor complex indicated a similar topology to that of the IL-23 receptor, but its resolution was not sufficient to observe the detailed interaction between IL-12Rβ2 and IL-12p35.
“A previously published cryo-EM map of the IL-12 receptor complex indicated a similar topology to that of the IL-23 receptor; however, the resolution was not sufficient to observe the detailed interaction between IL-12Rβ2 and IL-12p35 (34).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] A. Vaswani , N. Shazeer , N. Parmar , J. Uszkoreit , L. Jones , A. N. Gomez , L. Kaiser , I. Polosukhin , Attention Is All You Need. arXiv [cs.CL] (2017), (available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762). source
The cited paper’s Background (p. 2) discusses self-attention, and its Model Variations section (p. 9) discusses Transformer settings. Searches for the IL-12 receptor, IL-23 receptor, cryo-EM, and the named receptor interactions found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationA central crevice extends into the membrane and is lined with residues required for activity (His182 and Asp213) or conserved (W298), as well as a pathogenic mutation (H183Q) found in progressive myoclonus epilepsy and dementia that decreases ceramide levels.
“A central crevice extends into the membrane and is lined with residues required for activity (His182 and Asp213) (30) or conserved (W298), as well as a pathogenic mutation (H183Q) found in progressive myoclonus epilepsy and dementia that decreases ceramide levels (31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] 2021, Structural basis for IL-12 and IL-23 receptor sharing reveals a gateway for shaping actions on T versus NK cells, Cell source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFollowing sequence and template search (~1.5 hours), the end-to-end version of RoseTTAFold requires ~10 minutes on an RTX2080 GPU to generate backbone coordinates for proteins with less than 400 residues.
“following sequence and template search (~1.5 hours), the end-to-end version of RoseTTAFold requires ~10 minutes on an RTX2080 GPU to generate backbone coordinates for proteins with less than 400 residues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe pyRosetta version requires 5 minutes for network calculations on a single RTX2080 GPU and an hour for all-atom structure generation with 15 CPU cores.
“the pyRosetta version requires 5 minutes for network calculations on a single RTX2080 GPU and an hour for all-atom structure generation with 15 CPU cores”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver one-third of the 693 RoseTTAFold models for human disease-related protein domains have a predicted lDDT > 0.8, which corresponded to an average Cα-RMSD of 2.6 Å on CASP14 targets.
“Over one-third of these models have a predicted lDDT > 0.8, which corresponded to an average Cα-RMSD of 2.6 Å on CASP14 targets (fig. S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe increased prediction accuracy was critical for success in all four molecular replacement cases, as models made with trRosetta did not yield MR solutions.
“The increased prediction accuracy was critical for success in all cases, as models made with trRosetta did not yield MR solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationNo homologs of the C-terminal domain of SLP or any portion of Lrbp could be detected using HHsearch.
“while no homologs of the C-terminal domain of SLP or any portion of Lrbp could be detected using HHsearch (13)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 2021, The phenotype associated with variants in TANGO2 may be explained by a dual role of the protein in ER-to-Golgi transport and at the mitochondria, J. Inherit. Metab. Dis source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe top HHsearch hit for the p101 Gβγ binding domain has a statistically insignificant E-value of 40 and only covers 14 residues out of 167 residues.
“The top HHsearch hit has a statistically insignificant E-value of 40 and only covers 14 residues out of 167 residues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe RoseTTAFold model of TANGO2 adopts an N-terminal nucleophile aminohydrolase (Ntn) fold with well-aligned active site residues that are conserved in TANGO2 orthologs.
“The RoseTTAFold model of TANGO2 adopts an N-terminal nucleophile aminohydrolase (Ntn) fold (Fig. 3A) with well-aligned active site residues that are conserved in TANGO2 orthologs (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataApproaches using iterative feeding of predicted structures as templates and random subsampling from MSAs generated ensembles containing higher accuracy models.
“These approaches generated ensembles containing higher accuracy models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe improved accuracy from combining multiple discontinuous crops arises from selecting the most relevant sequences for each region from the large number of aligned sequences.
“We hypothesized that this arises from selecting the most relevant sequences for each region from the very large number of aligned sequences often available (fig. S4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAlphaFold2 used a two-track network architecture in which information at the 1D sequence level and the 2D distance map level is iteratively transformed and passed back and forth.
“use of a two-track network architecture in which information at the 1D sequence level and the 2D distance map level is iteratively transformed and passed back and forth”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CASP14 conference
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncomplete optimization due to computer memory limitations and neglect of side chain information likely explain the poorer performance of the end-to-end version compared to the pyRosetta version.
“Incomplete optimization due to computer memory limitations and neglect of side chain information likely explain the poorer performance of the end-to-end version compared to the pyRosetta version (Fig. 1B; the latter incorporates side chain information at the all-atom relaxation stage)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe relatively low compute cost makes it straightforward to incorporate the methods in a public server and predict structures for large sets of proteins.
“The relatively low compute cost makes it straightforward to incorporate the methods in a public server and predict structures for large sets of proteins, for example, all human GPCRs, as described below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAlphaFold2 started from multiple sequence alignments rather than from more processed features such as inverse covariance matrices derived from MSAs.
“starting from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) rather than from more processed features such as inverse covariance matrices derived from MSAs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CASP14 conference
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSince SE(3)-equivariant layers are used in the main body of the 3-track model, the added gain from the final SE(3) layer is likely less than in the AlphaFold2 case.
“since SE(3)-equivariant layers are used in the main body of the 3-track model, the added gain from the final SE(3) layer is likely less than in the AlphaFold2 case”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere is a cysteine in an extension following the predicted ADAM33 prodomain barrel; taken together, these data are consistent with experimental data suggesting that the ADAM prodomain inhibits metalloprotease activity using a cysteine switch.
“There is a cysteine in an extension following the predicted prodomain barrel; taken together, these data are consistent with experimental data suggesting that the ADAM prodomain inhibits metalloprotease activity using a cysteine switch (26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe poorer performance of the 3-track model compared to AlphaFold2 could reflect hardware limitations, alternative architectures or loss formulations, or more intensive use of the network for inference.
“This could reflect hardware limitations that limited the size of the models we could explore, alternative architectures or loss formulations, or more intensive use of the network for inference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStructure information is not available for any of the CerS enzymes or their homologs, and the number and orientation of transmembrane helices are not known.
“Structure information is not available for any of the CerS enzymes or their homologs, and the number and orientation of transmembrane helices (TMH) are not known (28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningConserved residues within ADAM33 orthologs line one side of the barrel and likely interact with the metalloprotease.
“Conserved residues within ADAM33 orthologs line one side of the barrel and likely interact with the metalloprotease (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe RoseTTAFold model suggests a role for the IL-12Rβ2 N-terminal peptide (residue 24-31) in IL-12 binding, with IL-12Rβ2 D26 possibly interacting with nearby K190 and K194 in IL-12p35.
“In addition, the model suggests a role for the IL-12Rβ2 N-terminal peptide (residue 24-31) in IL-12 binding not observed in the IL-12 cryo-electron microscopy (IL-12Rβ2 D26 may interact with nearby K190 and K194 in IL-12p35), which may provide an avenue to target the interaction between IL-12 and IL-12Rβ2 specifically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTransmembrane spanning Ceramide synthase (CERS1) is a key enzyme in sphingolipid metabolism which uses acyl-CoA to generate ceramides with various acyl chain lengths that regulate differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis.
“Transmembrane spanning Ceramide synthase (CERS1) is a key enzyme in sphingolipid metabolism which uses acyl-CoA to generate ceramides with various acyl chain lengths that regulate differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis (27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningRoseTTAFold enables direct building of accurate models of protein-protein complexes from sequence information, rapidly and without the standard procedure of building individual subunit models and then rigid-body docking.
“Thus, the network enables the direct building of structure models for protein-protein complexes from sequence information, short circuiting the standard procedure of building models for individual subunits and then carrying out rigid-body docking.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“RoseTTAFold enables solutions of challenging X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM modeling problems, provides insight into protein function in the absence of experimentally determined structures, and rapidly generates accurate models of protein-protein complexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe network was trained on monomeric proteins, not complexes, so there may be some training set bias in the monomer structures, but there is none for the complexes.
“The network was trained on monomeric proteins, not complexes, so there may be some training set bias in the monomer structures, but there is none for the complexes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The prediction of protein structure from amino acid sequence information alone has been a longstanding challenge.
“The prediction of protein structure from amino acid sequence information alone has been a longstanding challenge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Solution of X-ray structures by molecular replacement often requires quite accurate models.
“Solution of X-ray structures by molecular replacement (MR) often requires quite accurate models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Building atomic models of protein assemblies from cryo-EM maps can be challenging in the absence of homologs with known structures.
“Building atomic models of protein assemblies from cryo-EM maps can be challenging in the absence of homologs with known structures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Experimental structure determination can provide considerable insight into biological function and mechanism.
“Experimental structure determination can provide considerable insight into biological function and mechanism.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Protein structures can provide insight into how mutations in key proteins lead to human disease.
“Protein structures can provide insight into how mutations in key proteins lead to human disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Blind structure prediction tests are needed to assess any new protein structure prediction method.
“Blind structure prediction tests are needed to assess any new protein structure prediction method”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RF has properties well suited for use in a protein design DDPM: it generates protein structures with high precision, operates on a rigid-frame representation of residues with rotational equivariance, and has an architecture enabling conditioning on design specifications at residue, inter-residue distance and orientation, and 3D coordinate levels.
“RF has properties well suited for use in a protein design DDPM (Fig. 1a): it generates protein structures with high precision, operates on a rigid-frame representation of residues with rotational equivariance and has an architecture enabling conditioning on design specifications at the individual residue, inter-residue distance and orientation, and 3D coordinate levels.”
From De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAI modeling paradigms have been used successfully in the biomolecular realm, for example, to predict 3D molecular structures from sequences and interactions between different molecular components.
“Such modeling paradigms have been used successfully in the biomolecular realm, for example, to predict three-dimensional (3D) molecular structures from sequences32–34 and interactions between different molecular components.35–38”
From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Predicted structures for gpsB/0353 from AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold align nearly exactly with the crystal structure of the GpsB protein from B. subtilis (RCSB PDB: 4UG3) when aligned at the N-terminal coiled-coil domain using STAMP.
“Predicted structures for gene gpsB/0353 from AlphaFold222 (and the related protein structure prediction software RoseTTAFold36) align nearly exactly with the crystal structure of the GpsB protein from B. subtilis (RCSB PDB: 4UG3(58)) when aligned only at the N-terminal coiled-coil domain using STAMP41 and visualizing in VMD42 as is shown in Figure 1A.”
From Toward the Complete Functional Characterization of a Minimal Bacterial Proteome (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
The RoseTTAFold pipeline for complex modelling only generates MSAs for bacterial protein complexes, while the proteins in the test set are mainly Eukaryotic.
“The RoseTTAFold pipeline for complex modelling only generates MSAs for bacterial protein complexes, while the proteins in our test set are mainly Eukaryotic.”
From Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2 (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
The ‘Direct generation of protein-protein complex models’ section says RoseTTAFold was tested on paired sequence alignments and describes a model of a human complex, but it does not say that its pipeline generates MSAs only for bacterial complexes. The source also cannot establish the composition of the citing authors’ test set. Searches for bacterial-only MSA generation and eukaryotic complexes did not resolve either point. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRosettaFold performed better than trRosetta in guiding protein design by functional-site-constrained hallucination.
“Following the development of RosettaFold (RF) (16) we found that it performed better than trRosetta in guiding protein design by functional-site-constrained hallucination (Fig. S1G)”
From Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
The better performance of RosettaFold than trRosetta in guiding functional-site-constrained hallucination likely reflects better overall modeling of protein sequence-structure relationships.
“likely reflecting the better overall modeling of protein sequence-structure relationships (16).”
From Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Machine-learning tools such as AF2, RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold are currently the most accurate answer to the structure prediction problem.
“are the best and most accurate answer to the structure prediction problem to date”
From The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
DeepMind's AlphaFold2 success in sequence-based protein structure prediction, the RoseTTAFold open-source counterpart, and the publicly available AlphaFold2 prediction of all human proteins are major steps that benefit the scientific community.
“DeepMind’s AlphaFold2 success in sequence-based protein structure prediction,4 as well as the RoseTTAFold70 open-source counterpart, and the publicly available AlphaFold2 prediction of all human proteins203 are major steps that benefit the scientific community.”
From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [70]
In protein structure prediction, physical-based methods are hardly expected to compete with artificial intelligence software such as AlphaFold 2 and RoseTTAFold.
“Indeed in the context of protein structure prediction, physical-based methods are hardly expected to compete with artificial intelligence software such as Alphafold 2 [74] and RoseTTAFold [75].”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [75]
The unprecedented accuracy of AlphaFold2, RosettaFold, and others offers the opportunity to virtually screen any protein of interest with structure-based approach, irrespective of a priori ligandability.
“The unprecedented accuracy of AlphaFold2,127 RosettaFold,128 and others129,130 offers, at least in principle, the opportunity to virtually screen any protein of interest with the structure-based approach, irrespective of its a priori ligandability (after AlphaFold2, the structural coverage of the human proteome increased from 48% to 76% of the total residues).131”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [128]
AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold achieve accurate protein structure prediction by exploiting evolutionary information in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs).
“Recent breakthroughs have used deep learning to exploit evolutionary information in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) to accurately predict protein structures.”
From High-resolution <i>de novo</i> structure prediction from primary sequence (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold need as input evolutionary data in the form of MSAs of homologous sequences aligned to the primary one.
“Both these methods need as input evolutionary data in the form of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of homologous sequences aligned to the primary one, a technique which has been a staple of structure prediction methods (1,2,(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).”
From High-resolution <i>de novo</i> structure prediction from primary sequence (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Some examples of using a neural network model to predict complex structures were demonstrated with RoseTTAFold, whose design was inspired by AF2.
“some examples of using such a neural network model to predict complex structures were demonstrated with RoseTTAFold7, whose design was inspired by AF2”
From AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The Baker group have recently reported using deep learning methods developed for single proteins to directly predict the structure of multimers.
“Fourth, that group have recently reported using deep learning methods developed for single proteins to directly predict the structure of multimers28.”
From Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp> (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The Baker group has already reported modeling accuracy similar to that of AlphaFold2 using deep learning methods.
“the Baker group has already reported modeling accuracy similar to that of AlphaFold2 using deep learning methods28.”
From Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp> (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The new report from the Baker group uses the deep learning system developed for monomers to directly build multimers, in some circumstances obviating the problem.
“As already noted, the new report from the Baker group uses the deep learning system developed for monomers to directly built multimers, in some circumstances obviating the problem48.”
From Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp> (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
AI-driven tertiary structure prediction models from DeepMind and RoseTTAFold have redefined the definition of low-hanging fruit with respect to structural enablement of ligases.
“the definition of low-hanging fruit with respect to structural enablement of ligases has recently been redefined with the ground-breaking publication of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tertiary structure prediction models from Google/DeepMind141 and RoseTTAFold142.”
From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [142]
Recent deep-learning-based advances in protein structure prediction enable accurate modeling not only of protein monomer structures but also protein complexes.
“Recent deep-learning-based advances in protein structure prediction (13,14) have the potential to increase the power of such approaches as they now enable accurate modeling not only of protein monomer structures but also protein complexes (13).”
From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
The RoseTTAFold method employs direct embeddings of MSAs to produce distance restraints as well as to produce coordinates directly.
“The RoseTTAFold method employs direct embeddings of MSAs to produce distance restraints, as well as to produce coordinates directly (17).”
From Ultrafast end-to-end protein structure prediction enables high-throughput exploration of uncharacterised proteins (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Intricate structures such as the NPC can now be modeled thanks to in situ and in cellulo cryo-ET and powerful AI-based prediction.
“Thanks to in situ and in cellulo cryo-ET and powerful AI-based prediction (27,28), intricate structures such as the NPC can be now modeled.”
From AI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
AlphaFold and RoseTTAfold have demonstrated unprecedented accuracy in predicting structures of monomeric proteins.
“However, AlphaFold and RoseTTAfold have recently demonstrated unprecedented accuracy in predicting structures of monomeric proteins (27,28,(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66) and complexes (35,62,67,68).”
From AI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
AlphaFold and RoseTTAfold accurately assess their confidence at the level of individual residues and interdomain contacts.
“The programs were also shown to accurately assess their confidence at the level of individual residues and interdomain contacts (27,28,62).”
From AI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010 · Cited by 46,209 · see citing works
Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0
Larkin, M., Blackshields, G., Brown, N. P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I. M., Wilm, A., López, R., et al. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 · Cited by 28,221 · see citing works
Features and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. D. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 27,510 · see citing works
<i>Phaser</i> crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612 · see citing works
Self-citationSWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes
Waterhouse, A. M., Bertoni, M., Bienert, S., Studer, G., Tauriello, G., Gumienny, R., Heer, F. T., de Beer, T., Rempfer, C., Bordoli, L., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky427 · Cited by 13,005 · see citing works
UCSF ChimeraX : Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Couch, G. S., Croll, T. I., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2020) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3943 · Cited by 9,327 · see citing works
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase
Apweiler, R. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh131 · Cited by 7,535 · see citing works
Liebschner, D. C., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkòczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B. J., Hung, L., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., et al. (2019) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798319011471 · Cited by 6,709 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards automated crystallographic structure refinement with <i>phenix.refine</i>
Afonine, P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Mustyakimov, M., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A., Zwart, P. H., & Adams, P. D. (2012) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444912001308 · Cited by 5,511 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Pfam protein families database in 2019
El-Gebali, S., Mistry, J., Bateman, A., Eddy, S. R., Luciani, A., Potter, S. C., Qureshi, M., Richardson, L. J., Salazar, G. A., Smart, A., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky995 · Cited by 4,602 · see citing works
MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all‐atom structure validation
Williams, C. J., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Prisant, M. G., Videau, L. L., Deis, L. N., Verma, V., Keedy, D. A., Hintze, B. J., Chen, V. B., et al. (2018) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3330 · Cited by 4,599 · see citing works
Self-citationUniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase
The UniProt Consortium (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1099 · Cited by 4,436 · see citing works
Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Senior, A. W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T., Qin, C., Žídek, A., Nelson, A. W. R., Bridgland, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · Cited by 3,378 · see citing works
A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core
Zimmermann, L., Stephens, A., Nam, S.-Z., Rau, D., Kübler, J., Lozajic, M., Gabler, F., Söding, J., Lupas, A. N., & Alva, V. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · Cited by 2,522 · see citing works
I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions
Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv342 · Cited by 2,486 · see citing works
Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality
Zhang, Y., & Skolnick, J. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20264 · Cited by 2,392 · see citing works
Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models
Benkert, P., Biasini, M., & Schwede, T. F. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662 · Cited by 2,259 · see citing works
The SWISS-MODEL Repository—new features and functionality
Bienert, S., Waterhouse, A. M., de Beer, T., Tauriello, G., Studer, G., Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. F. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1132 · Cited by 1,732 · see citing works
Maximum-likelihood density modification
Terwilliger, T. C. (2000) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444900005072 · Cited by 1,637 · see citing works
Van Wart, H. E., & Birkedal-Hansen, H. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.14.5578 · Cited by 1,475 · see citing works
Terwilliger, T. C., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Afonine, P. V., Moriarty, N. W., Zwart, P. H., Hung, L.-W., Read, R. J., & Adams, P. D. (2008) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s090744490705024x · Cited by 1,462 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations
Yang, J., Anishchenko, I., Park, H., Peng, Z., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · Cited by 1,421 · see citing works
Self-citationMészáros, B., Erdős, G., & Dosztányi, Z. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gky384 · Cited by 1,376 · see citing works
Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure
Johnson, L. S., Eddy, S. R., & Portugaly, E. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · Cited by 1,332 · see citing works
HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation
Steinegger, M., Meier, M., Mirdita, M., Vöhringer, H., Haunsberger, S. J., & Söding, J. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · Cited by 1,145 · see citing works
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., & Schwede, T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
The SWISS-MODEL Repository: new features and functionalities
Kopp, J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj056 · Cited by 1,001 · see citing works
Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classification
Shi, Y., Huang, Z., Feng, S., Zhong, H., Wang, W., & Sun, Y. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/214 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
The lipocalin protein family: structural and sequence overview
Flower, D. R., North, A. C. T., & Sansom, C. E. (2000) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00148-5 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Protein Sequence Analysis Using the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit
Gabler, F., Nam, S., Till, S., Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M., Söding, J., Lupas, A. N., & Alva, V. (2020) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.108 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta
Chaudhury, S., Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2010) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments
Mirdita, M., von den Driesch, L., Galiez, C., Martin, M. J., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Rethinking Attention with Performers
Choromanski, K., Likhosherstov, V., Dohan, D., Song, X., Gane, A., Sarlos, T., Hawkins, P., Davis, J., Mohiuddin, A., Kaiser, L., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.14794 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Levy, M., & Futerman, A. H. (2010) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.319 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing Dali for Protein Structure Comparison
Holm, L. (2020) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_3 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment
Pei, J.-M., & Grishin, N. (2001) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.700 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Self-citationWolfsberg, T. G., Primakoff, P., Myles, D. G., & White, J. M. (1995) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.131.2.275 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
ECOD: an evolutionary classification of protein domains
Cheng, H., Schaeffer, R. D., Liao, Y., Kinch, L. N., Pei, J., Shi, S., Kim, B.-H., & Grishin, N. V. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003926 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attention
Jaegle, A., Gimeno, F., Brock, A., Zisserman, A., Vinyals, O., & Carreira, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03206 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling
Conway, P., Tyka, M. D., DiMaio, F., Konerding, D. E., & Baker, D. A. (2013) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2389 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationAxial Attention in Multidimensional Transformers
Ho, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Weissenborn, D., & Salimans, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.12180 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
GPCRdb in 2021: integrating GPCR sequence, structure and function
Kooistra, A. J., Mordalski, S., Pándy-Szekeres, G., Esguerra, M., Mamyrbekov, A., Munk, C., Keserű, G. M., & Gloriam, D. E. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1080 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Rao, R., Liu, J., Verkuil, R., Meier, J., Canny, J. F., Abbeel, P., Sercu, T., & Rives, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.02.12.430858 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention Networks
Fuchs, F. B., Worrall, D. E., Fischer, V., & Welling, M. (2020) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.10503 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Improved protein structure refinement guided by deep learning based accuracy estimation
Hiranuma, N., Park, H., Baek, M., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., & Baker, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21511-x · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein interaction networks revealed by proteome coevolution
Cong, Q., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw6718 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, M., Suh, J., Romano, D., Truong, M. H., Mullin, K., Hooli, B., Norton, D., Tesco, G., Elliott, K., Wagner, S. L., et al. (2009) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddp323 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
OMA orthology in 2021: website overhaul, conserved isoforms, ancestral gene order and more
Altenhoff, A., Train, C. M., Gilbert, K. J., Mediratta, I., de Farias, T. M., Moi, D., Nevers, Y., Radoykova, H.-S., Rossier, V., Vesztrocy, A. W., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1007 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Improvement of molecular-replacement models withSculptor
Bunkòczi, G., & Read, R. J. (2011) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910051218 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationCrystal structures of VAP1 reveal ADAMs' MDC domain architecture and its unique C‐shaped scaffold
Takeda, S., Igarashi, T., Mori, H., & Araki, S. (2006) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601131 · Cited by 202 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The ADAMs contain prodomain and metalloprotease domains; the fold of the metalloprotease is known (18, 19), but not that of the prodomain, which has no homologs of known structure.”
Toward optimal fragment generations for ab initio protein structure assembly
Xu, D. H., & Zhang, Y. (2012) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24179 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
TRAM, LAG1 and CLN8: members of a novel family of lipid-sensing domains?
Winter, E., & Ponting, C. P. (2002) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(02)02154-0 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Glassman, C. R., Mathiharan, Y. K., Jude, K. M., Su, L., Panova, O., Lupardus, P. J., Spangler, J. B., Ely, L. K., Thomas, C., Skiniotis, G., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.018 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationKlein, T., & Bischoff, R. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr100556z · Cited by 179 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The ADAM (A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease) and ADAMTS families of metalloproteases are encoded by over 40 human genes, mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions (15, 16) and are involved in a range of human diseases, including cancer metastasis, inflammatory disorders, neurological diseases and asthma (16, 17).”
MoRDa, an automatic molecular replacement pipeline
Vagin, A. A., & Lebedev, A. A. (2015) · Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · doi:10.1107/s2053273315099672 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Haas, J., Barbato, A., Behringer, D., Studer, G., Roth, S., Bertoni, M., Mostaguir, K., Gumienny, R., & Schwede, T. (2018) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25431 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
SPOT-Disorder2: Improved Protein Intrinsic Disorder Prediction by Ensembled Deep Learning
Hanson, J., Paliwal, K. K., Litfin, T., & Zhou, Y. (2019) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.01.004 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Lalani, S. R., Liu, P., Rosenfeld, J. A., Watkin, L. B., Chiang, T., Leduc, M. S., Zhu, W., Ding, Y., Pan, S., Vetrini, F., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.008 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
IntFOLD: an integrated web resource for high performance protein structure and function prediction
McGuffin, L. J., Adiyaman, R., Maghrabi, A. H. A., Shuid, A. N., Brackenridge, D. A., Nealon, J. O., & Philomina, L. S. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz322 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Necessary Role for the Lag1p Motif in (Dihydro)ceramide Synthase Activity
Spassieva, S., Seo, J.-G., Jiang, J. C., Bielawski, J., Alvarez-Vasquez, F., Jazwinski, S. M., Hannun, Y. A., & Obeid, L. M. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m608092200 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Zhong, S., & Khalil, R. A. (2019) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2019.03.033 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Read, R. J., & McCoy, A. J. (2011) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910051371 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationKremer, L. S., Distelmaier, F., Alhaddad, B., Hempel, M., Iuso, A., Küpper, C., Mühlhausen, C., Kovács-Nagy, R., Satanovskij, R. M., Graf, E., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.009 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised ClassificationPreprint
Shi, Y., Huang, Z., Feng, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.03509 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Impairment of ceramide synthesis causes a novel progressive myoclonus epilepsy
Vanni, N., Fruscione, F., Ferlazzo, E., Striano, P., Robbiano, A., Traverso, M., Sander, T., Falace, A., Gazzerro, E., Bramanti, P., et al. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24170 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Terwilliger, T. C., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Afonine, P. V., et al. (2008) · PubMed · doi:10.17863/cam.52329 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human ADAM33
Orth, P., Reichert, P., Wang, W., Prosise, W. W., Yarosh-Tomaine, T., Hammond, G., Ingram, R. N., Xiao, L., Mirza, U. A., Zou, J., et al. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.037 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Ju, F., Zhu, J., Shao, B., Kong, L., Liu, T., Zheng, W., & Bu, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22869-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12
Lafita, A., Bliven, S., Kryshtafovych, A., Bertoni, M., Monastyrskyy, B., Duarte, J. M., Schwede, T., & Capitani, G. (2017) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25408 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Ab initio solution of macromolecular crystal structures without direct methods
McCoy, A. J., Oeffner, R. D., Wrobel, A. G., Ojala, J. R. M., Tryggvason, K., Lohkamp, B., & Read, R. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1701640114 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationKono, M., Sugiura, K., Suganuma, M., Hayashi, M., Takama, H., Suzuki, T., Matsunaga, K., Tomita, Y., & Akiyama, M. (2013) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt207 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Milev, M. P., Saint‐Dic, D., Zardoui, K., Klopstock, T., Law, C., Distelmaier, F., & Sacher, M. (2021) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1002/jimd.12312 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Haas, J., Gumienny, R., Barbato, A., Ackermann, F., Tauriello, G., Bertoni, M., Studer, G., Smolinski, A., & Schwede, T. F. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25815 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Improving homology modeling from low-sequence identity templates in Rosetta: A case study in GPCRs
Bender, B. J., Marlow, B., & Meiler, J. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007597 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
RUPEE: A fast and accurate purely geometric protein structure search
Ayoub, R., & Lee, Y. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Virtanen, J., Xue, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx349 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Ceramide synthases: Reflections on the impact of Dr. Lina M. Obeid
Kim, J. L., Mestre, B., Shin, S.-H., & Futerman, A. H. (2021) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109958 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The DBSAV Database: Predicting Deleteriousness of Single Amino Acid Variations in the Human Proteome
Pei, J., & Grishin, N. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166915 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationBunkóczi, G., Wallner, B., & Read, R. J. (2015) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.11.020 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationTANGOing along the protein secretion pathway.
Rabouille, C., & Kondylis, V. (2006) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-213 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
RoseTTAFold: The first release of RoseTTAFold
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., et al. (2021) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5068264 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2011, phenix. ensembler: a tool for multiple superposition, Comput Crystallogr Newsl, 2, 8
- 2015, in ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES (INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY 2 ABBEY SQ, CHESTER, CH1 2HU, ENGLAND, 71, S19
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Self-citationVaradi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue
Békés, M., Langley, D. R., & Crews, C. M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6 · Cited by 3,395 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
Self-citationDe novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
Self-citationVaradi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.03.494563 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works
Self-citationRobust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add2187 · Cited by 2,070 · see citing works
Self-citationScientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence.
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2 · Cited by 1,823 · see citing works
Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking
Tsaban, T., Varga, J. K., Avraham, O., Ben-Aharon, Z., Khramushin, A., & Schueler-Furman, O. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome
Johnson, J. L., Yaron, T. M., Huntsman, E. M., Kerelsky, A., Song, J., Regev, A., Lin, T.-Y., Liberatore, K., Cizin, D. M., Cohen, B. M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05575-3 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Self-citationComputed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes
Humphreys, I. R., Pei, J., Baek, M., Krishnakumar, A., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S., Zhang, J., Ness, T. J., Banjade, S., Bagde, S. R., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm4805 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Self-citationCritical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp>
Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T., Topf, M., Fidelis, K., & Moult, J. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26237 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning
Wang, J., Lisanza, S., Juergens, D., Tischer, D., Watson, J. L., Castro, K. M., Ragotte, R., Saragovi, A., Milles, L. F., Baek, M., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn2100 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Floristean, C., Kharkar, A., Roy, K., Rochereau, C., Ahdritz, G., Zhang, J., Church, G. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Single-sequence protein structure prediction using language models from deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Rochereau, C., Church, G. M., Sorger, P. K., & AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.02.454840 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning
Bennett, N. R., Coventry, B., Goreshnik, I., Huang, B., Allen, A., Vafeados, D., Peng, Y. P., Dauparas, J., Baek, M., Stewart, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38328-5 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Self-citationHow to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities
Bunne, C., Roohani, Y., Rosen, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, X., Roed, M., Alexandrov, T., AlQuraishi, M., Brennan, P., Burkhardt, D. B., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.015 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
High-resolution <i>de novo</i> structure prediction from primary sequence
Wu, R., Ding, F., Wang, R., Shen, R., Zhang, X., Luo, S., Su, C., Wu, Z., Xie, Q., Berger, B., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.21.500999 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Accurate prediction of protein–nucleic acid complexes using RoseTTAFoldNA
Baek, M., McHugh, R., Anishchenko, I., Jiang, H., Baker, D., & DiMaio, F. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02086-5 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Self-citationBenchmarking <scp>AlphaFold</scp> for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4379 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Ren, F., Ding, X., Zheng, M., Korzinkin, M., Cai, X., Zhu, W., Mantsyzov, A., Aliper, A., Aladinskiy, V., Cao, Z., et al. (2023) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d2sc05709c · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationAI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores
Mosalaganti, S., Obarska-Kosinska, A., Siggel, M., Taniguchi, R., Turoňová, B., Zimmerli, C. E., Buczak, K., Schmidt, F. H., Margiotta, E., Mackmull, M.-T., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm9506 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Clustering predicted structures at the scale of the known protein universe
Barrio-Hernandez, I., Yeo, J., Jänes, J., Mirdita, M., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Wein, T., Varadi, M., Velankar, S., Beltrao, P., & Steinegger, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06510-w · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Scalable emulation of protein equilibrium ensembles with generative deep learning
Lewis, S., Hempel, T., Jiménez-Luna, J., Gastegger, M., Xie, Y., Foong, A. Y. K., Satorras, V. G., Abdin, O., Veeling, B. S., Zaporozhets, I., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adv9817 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.23.465575 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Empowering biomedical discovery with AI agents
Gao, S., Fang, A., Huang, Y., Giunchiglia, V., Noori, A., Schwarz, J. R., Ektefaie, Y., Kondic, J., & Zitnik, M. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.022 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Benchmarking AlphaFold‐enabled molecular docking predictions for antibiotic discovery
Wong, F., Krishnan, A., Zheng, E. J., Stärk, H., Manson, A. L., Earl, A. M., Jaakkola, T., & Collins, J. J. (2022) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202211081 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies
Wicky, B. I. M., Milles, L. F., Courbet, A., Ragotte, R. J., Dauparas, J., Kinfu, E., Tipps, S., Kibler, R. D., Baek, M., DiMaio, F., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add1964 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationAF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning
Gao, M., Nakajima An, D., Parks, J. M., & Skolnick, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29394-2 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network
Burke, D. F., Bryant, P., Barrio-Hernandez, I., Memon, D., Pozzati, G., Shenoy, A., Zhu, W., Dunham, A. S., Albanese, P., Keller, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00910-8 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Skolnick, J., Gao, M., Zhou, H., & Singh, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01114 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2
Alderson, T. R., Pritišanac, I., Kolarić, Đ., Moses, A. M., & Forman-Kay, J. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Multi‐state modeling of G‐protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy
Heo, L., & Feig, M. (2022) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26382 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?
Hasselgren, C., & Oprea, T. I. (2024) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-040323-040828 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Jablonka, K. M., Ai, Q., Al-Feghali, A., Badhwar, S., Bocarsly, J. D., Bran, A. M., Bringuier, S., Brinson, L. C., Choudhary, K., Circi, D., et al. (2023) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d3dd00113j · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Antibody structure prediction using interpretable deep learning
Ruffolo, J. A., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100406 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
A general model to predict small molecule substrates of enzymes based on machine and deep learning
Kroll, A., Ranjan, S., Engqvist, M. K. M., & Lercher, M. J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38347-2 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery
Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Jang, H. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04346 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine
Thornton, J. M., Laskowski, R. A., & Borkakoti, N. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01533-0 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
An atlas of protein homo-oligomerization across domains of life
Schweke, H., Pacesa, M., Levin, T., Goverde, C. A., Kumar, P., Duhoo, Y., Dornfeld, L. J., Dubreuil, B., Georgeon, S., Ovchinnikov, S., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.022 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationABlooper: fast accurate antibody CDR loop structure prediction with accuracy estimation
Abanades, B., Georges, G., Bujotzek, A., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac016 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins
Agarwal, V., & McShan, A. C. (2024) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Luo, S., Su, Y., Peng, X., Wang, S., Peng, J., & Ma, J. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.10.499510 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T., Topf, M., Fidelis, K., & Moult, J. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26617 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“The next most successful method is RosettaFold, 24 though the difference in performance is substantial.”
MethodProtein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier
Lane, T. J. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01760-4 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Protein language model embeddings for fast, accurate, alignment-free protein structure prediction
Weissenow, K., Heinzinger, M., & Rost, B. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.31.454572 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
The structural coverage of the human proteome before and after AlphaFold
Porta-Pardo, E., Ruiz-Serra, V., Valentini, S., & Valencia, A. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009818 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Peptide-binding specificity prediction using fine-tuned protein structure prediction networks
Motmaen, A., Dauparas, J., Baek, M., Abedi, M. H., Baker, D., & Bradley, P. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2216697120 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine learning modeling of family wide enzyme-substrate specificity screens
Goldman, S., Das, R., Yang, K. K., & Coley, C. W. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009853 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The social and structural architecture of the yeast protein interactome
Michaelis, A. C., Brunner, A.-D., Zwiebel, M., Meier, F., Strauss, M. T., Bludau, I., & Mann, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06739-5 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“We envisioned that recent breakthroughs in protein structure prediction 44–46 , including the ability to model several subunits of protein complexes 43,47 , would add an additional dimension to our interactome dataset.”
BackgroundAckloo, S., Al-awar, R., Amaro, R. E., Arrowsmith, C. H., Azevedo, H., Batey, R. A., Bengio, Y., Betz, U. A. K., Bologa, C. G., Chodera, J. D., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-022-00363-z · Cited by 112 · see citing works
AlphaFold2 reveals commonalities and novelties in protein structure space for 21 model organisms
Bordin, N., Sillitoe, I., Nallapareddy, V., Rauer, C., Lam, S. D., Waman, V. P., Sen, N., Heinzinger, M., Littmann, M., Kim, S., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04488-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Computer especially AI-assisted drug virtual screening and design in traditional Chinese medicine
Lin, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Yang, B., & Shen, Y.-Q. (2022) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154481 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Understanding a protein fold: The physics, chemistry, and biology of α-helical coiled coils
Woolfson, D. N. (2023) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104579 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
From interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2
Bret, H., Gao, J., Zea, D. J., Andreani, J., & Guerois, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44288-7 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
De novo protein design by inversion of the <scp>AlphaFold</scp> structure prediction network
Goverde, C. A., Wolf, B., Khakzad, H., Rosset, S., & Correia, B. E. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4653 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
AlQuraishi, M., & Sorger, P. K. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01283-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Genomic language model predicts protein co-regulation and function
Hwang, Y., Cornman, A. L., Kellogg, E. H., Ovchinnikov, S., & Girguis, P. R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46947-9 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictomes, a classifier-curated database of AlphaFold-modeled protein-protein interactions
Schmid, E. W., & Walter, J. C. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.01.034 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“To address these challenges, researchers are increasingly using deep learning methods to model protein structures 12,13 and PPIs.”
Sala, D., Hildebrand, P. W., & Meiler, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1121962 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Lindorff-Larsen, K., & Kragelund, B. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167196 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding
Outeiral, C., Nissley, D. A., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab881 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Building structural models of a whole mycoplasma cell
Maritan, M., Autin, L., Karr, J., Covert, M. W., Olson, A. J., & Goodsell, D. S. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167351 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Novel machine learning approaches revolutionize protein knowledge
Bordin, N., Dallago, C., Heinzinger, M., Kim, S., Littmann, M., Rauer, C., Steinegger, M., Rost, B., & Orengo, C. (2023) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2022.11.001 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development
Farghali, H., Kutinová Canová, N., & Arora, M. (2021) · Physiological Research · doi:10.33549/physiolres.934765 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Giri, N., Roy, R. S., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102536 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Improved Docking of Protein Models by a Combination of Alphafold2 and ClusPro
Ghani, U., Desta, I., Jindal, A., Khan, O., Jones, G., Hashemi, N., Kotelnikov, S., Padhorny, D., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.07.459290 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Protein design via deep learning
Ding, W., Nakai, K., & Gong, H. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac102 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
AAV capsid design: A Goldilocks challenge
Zolotukhin, S., & Vandenberghe, L. H. (2022) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2022.01.003 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Assessing the utility of <scp>CASP14</scp> models for molecular replacement
Millán, C., Keegan, R. M., Pereira, J., Sammito, M. D., Simpkin, A. J., McCoy, A. J., Lupas, A. N., Hartmann, M. D., Rigden, D. J., & Read, R. J. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26214 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationChang, L., Mondal, A., Singh, B., Martínez‐Noa, Y., & Perez, A. (2024) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1693 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence guided conformational mining of intrinsically disordered proteins
Gupta, A., Dey, S., Hicks, A., & Zhou, H.-X. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03562-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery and Development
Wang, P.-H., Chen, J.-H., Yang, Y.-Y., Lee, C., & Tseng, Y. J. (2023) · IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine · doi:10.1109/mnano.2023.3249499 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Integrative Structural Biology in the Era of Accurate Structure Prediction
Masrati, G., Landau, M., Ben-Tal, N., Lupas, A., Kosloff, M., & Kosinski, J. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167127 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
AlphaFold Models of Small Proteins Rival the Accuracy of Solution NMR Structures
Tejero, R., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A., & Montelione, G. T. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.877000 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Huang, Y. J., Zhang, N., Bersch, B., Fidelis, K., Inouye, M., Ishida, Y., Kryshtafovych, A., Kobayashi, N., Kuroda, Y., Liu, G., et al. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26246 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Deep learning methods for protein function prediction
Boadu, F., Lee, A., & Cheng, J. (2025) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202300471 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Fragment-based computational design of antibodies targeting structured epitopes
Aguilar Rangel, M., Bedwell, A., Costanzi, E., Taylor, R. J., Russo, R., Bernardes, G. J. L., Ricagno, S., Frydman, J., Vendruscolo, M., & Sormanni, P. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abp9540 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
<scp>NMR</scp> hawk‐eyed view of <scp>AlphaFold2</scp> structures
Zweckstetter, M. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4175 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Barbarin-Bocahu, I., & Graille, M. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798322002157 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Kæstel-Hansen, J., de Sautu, M., Saminathan, A., Scanavachi, G., Bango Da Cunha Correia, R. F., Juma Nielsen, A., Bleshøy, S. V., Tsolakidis, K., Boomsma, W., Kirchhausen, T., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02665-8 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Zeng, W., Dou, Y., Pan, L., Xu, L., & Peng, S. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52293-7 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence
Duran-Frigola, M., Cigler, M., & Winter, G. E. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c11098 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology
Marchetti, L., Nifosì, R., Martelli, P. L., Da Pozzo, E., Cappello, V., Banterle, F., Trincavelli, M. L., Martini, C., & D’Elia, M. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac437 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Predicting RNA structures and functions by artificial intelligence.
Zhang, J., Lang, M., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.10.001 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Predicting antibody binders and generating synthetic antibodies using deep learning
Lim, Y. W., Adler, A. S., & Johnson, D. S. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2022.2069075 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
An end-to-end framework for the prediction of protein structure and fitness from single sequence
Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Liu, D., Xing, Y., & Gong, H. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51776-x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Protein sequence‐to‐structure learning: Is this the end(‐to‐end revolution)?
Laine, E., Eismann, S., Elofsson, A., & Grudinin, S. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26235 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“combination was also leveraged in the most recent RoseTTAFold network.(148)”
BackgroundLi, S., Wu, S., Wang, L., Li, F., Jiang, H., & Bai, F. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence approaches to human-microbiome protein–protein interactions
Lim, H., Cankara, F., Tsai, C.-J., Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., & Gursoy, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102328 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
DEGRONOPEDIA: a web server for proteome-wide inspection of degrons
Szulc, N. A., Stefaniak, F., Piechota, M., Soszyńska, A., Piórkowska, G., Cappannini, A., Bujnicki, J. M., Maniaci, C., & Pokrzywa, W. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae238 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Representing structures of the multiple conformational states of proteins
Ramelot, T. A., Tejero, R., & Montelione, G. T. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., Millán, C., Park, H., Adams, C., Glassman, C. R., DeGiovanni, A., Pereira, J. H., Rodrigues, A. V., van Dijk, A. A., Ebrecht, A. C., Opperman, D. J., Sagmeister, T., Buhlheller, C., Pavkov-Keller, T., Rathinaswamy, M. K., Dalwadi, U., Yip, C. K., Burke, J. E., Garcia, K. C., Grishin, N. V., Adams, P. D., Read, R. J., & Baker, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- North-West University (ZA)
- University of the Free State (ZA)
- University of Graz (AT)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, David
- ORCID
- Baek, Minkyung
- DiMaio, Frank
- Anishchenko, Ivan
- Dauparas, Justas
- Ovchinnikov, Sergey
- Lee, Gyu Rie
- Wang, Jue
- Cong, Qian
- Kinch, Lisa N.
- Schaeffer, R. Dustin
- Millán, Claudia
- Park, Hahnbeom
- Adams, Carson
- Glassman, Caleb R.
- Pereira, Jose H.
- Rodrigues, Andria V.
- Ebrecht, Ana C.
- Opperman, Diederik J.
- Sagmeister, Theo
- Buhlheller, Christoph
- Rathinaswamy, Manoj K
- Dalwadi, Udit
- Yip, Calvin K
- Burke, John E
- Grishin, Nick V.
- Adams, Paul D.
- Read, Randy J.
- Baker, David
- Venue
- Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-06-15
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 6557
- Pages
- 871-876
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7612213
- OpenAlex
- W3186179742
- Semantic Scholar
- 51362860fb8ad08255660303550ed4bc345535fc
- Cited by
- 5,542
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 753 · 2025: 1082 · 2024: 1203 · 2023: 1196 · 2022: 1039 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 249.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (GM127390, 1937533)
- Welch Foundation (I‐1505)
- Washington Research Foundation
- Microsoft
- TU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und Mobilitätsprogramme
- Wellcome Trust (Z/17/Z, 209407/Z/17/Z, 209407)
- G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation
- Diamond Light Source
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Global Challenges Research Fund (ST/R002754/1)
- Schmidt Family Foundation
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
- Austrian Science Fund (P 29432, DOC 50)
- National Institutes of Health (5r35gm127390-05, DP5OD026389, P01GM063210, GM127390, RO1-AI51321)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (168998, 168907)
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/R002754/1)
- Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
- National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (DBI 1937533)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM127390, R01 GM123089, P01 GM063210)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI051321)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein structure prediction, protein-protein complex prediction, distance maps, sequence-based structure prediction, CASP14, protein function prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Computer Simulation, Membrane Proteins, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Folding, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Protein Subunits, Databases, Protein, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Multiprotein Complexes, Sphingosine N-Acyltransferase, ADAM Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review