The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy
Open accessAbstract
We describe a neural network system that predicts the locations of transmembrane helices in integral membrane proteins. By using evolutionary information as input to the network system, the method significantly improved on a previously published neural network prediction method that had been based on single sequence information. The input data were derived from multiple alignments for each position in a window of 13 adjacent residues: amino acid frequency, conservation weights, number of insertions and deletions, and position of the window with respect to the ends of the protein chain. Additional input was the amino acid composition and length of the whole protein. A rigorous cross‐validation test on 69 proteins with experimentally determined locations of transmembrane segments yielded an overall two‐state per‐residue accuracy of 95%. About 94% of all segments were predicted correctly. When applied to known globular proteins as a negative control, the network system incorrectly predicted fewer than 5% of globular proteins as having transmembrane helices. The method was applied to all 269 open reading frames from the complete yeast VIII chromosome. For 59 of these, at least two transmembrane helices were predicted. Thus, the prediction is that about one‐fourth of all proteins from yeast VIII contain one transmembrane helix, and some 20%, more than one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein
Kyte, J., & Doolittle, R. F. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · Cited by 22,843
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Self-citationImproved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,578
The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · Cited by 6,947
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“Matthews BW. 1975.”
A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites
von Heijne, G. (1986) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/14.11.4683 · Cited by 4,508
Deisenhofer, J., Epp, O., Miki, K., Huber, R., & Michel, H. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/318618a0 · Cited by 3,068
Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy
Henderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Ceska, T. A., Zemlin, F., Beckmann, E., & Downing, K. H. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80271-2 · Cited by 2,980
Cited by
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
Rost, B., Yachdav, G., & Liu, J. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh377 · Cited by 1,453
Self-citationTusnády, G. E., & Simon, I. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2107 · Cited by 1,079
Rost, B., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (1996) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560050824 · Cited by 607
Self-citationModeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rost, B., Sander, C., Casadio, R., & Fariselli, P.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 521-533
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2146396614
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560040318
- The paper
- Rost, B., Sander, C., Casadio, R., & Fariselli, P. (1995). Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560040318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
