The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studies of protein‐protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect
Open accessAbstract
Data sets of 362 structurally nonredundant protein‐protein interfaces and of 57 symmetry‐related oligomeric interfaces have been used to explore whether the hydrophobic effect that guides protein folding is also the main driving force for protein‐protein associations. The buried nonpolar surface area has been used to measure the hydrophobic effect. Our analysis indicates that, although the hydrophobic effect plays a dominant role in protein‐protein binding, it is not as strong as that observed in the interior of protein monomers. Comparison of the interiors of the monomers with those of the interfaces reveals that, in general, the hydrophobic amino acids are more frequent in the interior of the monomers than in the interior of the protein‐protein interfaces. On the other hand, a higher proportion of charged and polar residues are buried at the interfaces, suggesting that hydrogen bonds and ion pairs contribute more to the stability of protein binding than to that of protein folding. Moreover, comparison of the interior of the interfaces to protein surfaces indicates that the interfaces are poorer in polar/charged than the surfaces and are richer in hydrophobic residues. The interior of the interfaces appears to constitute a compromise between the stabilization contributed by the hydrophobic effect on the one hand and avoiding patches on the protein surfaces that are too hydrophobic on the other. Such patches would be unfavorable for the unassociated monomers in solution. We conclude that, although the types of interactions are similar between protein‐protein interfaces and single‐chain proteins overall, the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to protein‐protein associations is not as strong as to protein folding. This implies that packing patterns and interatom, or interresidue, pairwise potential functions, derived from monomers, are not ideally suited to predicting and assessing ligand associations or design. These would perform adequately only in cases where the hydrophobic effect at the binding site is substantial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations
Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R. E., Olafson, B. D., States, D. J., Swaminathan, S., & Karplus, M. (1983) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211 · Cited by 14,944
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,578
The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,850
Dominant forces in protein folding
Dill, K. A. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00483a001 · Cited by 3,800
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin
Shrake, A., & Rupley, J. A. (1973) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(73)90011-9 · Cited by 1,375
One thousand families for the molecular biologist
Chothia, C. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/357543a0 · Cited by 1,018
Interior and surface of monomeric proteins
Miller, S., Janin, J., Lesk, A. M., & Chothia, C. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6 · Cited by 949
Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins
Cornette, J. L., Cease, K. B., Margalit, H., Spouge, J. L., Berzofsky, J. A., & DeLisi, C. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90189-6 · Cited by 641
A novel approach to predicting protein structural classes in a (20–1)‐D amino acid composition space
Chou, K. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340210406 · Cited by 428
Cited by
Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Self-citationThe role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition
Rohs, R., West, S. M., Sosinsky, A., Liu, P., Mann, R. S., & Honig, B. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08473 · Cited by 1,096
Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040409x · Cited by 697
Self-citationFolding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function
Tsai, C., Kumar, S., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.8.6.1181 · Cited by 648
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, C., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H. J., & Nussinov, R.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-64
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2158919479
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies of protein‐protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560060106
- The paper
- Tsai, C., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H. J., & Nussinov, R. (1997). Studies of protein‐protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560060106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.