Principles of protein-protein interactions
Open accessAbstract
This review examines protein complexes in the Brookhaven Protein Databank to gain a better understanding of the principles governing the interactions involved in protein-protein recognition. The factors that influence the formation of protein-protein complexes are explored in four different types of protein-protein complexes--homodimeric proteins, heterodimeric proteins, enzyme-inhibitor complexes, and antibody-protein complexes. The comparison between the complexes highlights differences that reflect their biological roles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proteins rarely work alone; their simultaneous interactions with one another at the same location account for many cell functions.
“Proteins rarely work alone.They can interact with a variety of different molecules, but it is their simultaneous interactions with one another at the same location that account for many of the functions of the cell (Jones and Thornton, 1996).”
From Using statistical methods to model the fine-tuning of molecular machines and systems (2020) · cites this paper as Jones and Thornton, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988 · see citing works
Small molecules, big targets: drug discovery faces the protein–protein interaction challenge
Scott, D. E., Bayly, A. R., Abell, C., & Skidmore, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.29 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Structural Symmetry and Protein Function
Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.105 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials
Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R., & Vajda, S. (2006) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21117 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Inhibiting the p53–MDM2 interaction: an important target for cancer therapy
Chène, P. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc991 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges
DeLano, W. L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00283-x · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Hot spots—A review of the protein–protein interface determinant amino‐acid residues
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21396 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
High-affinity binders selected from designed ankyrin repeat protein libraries
Binz, H. K., Amstutz, P., Kohl, A., Stumpp, M. T., Briand, C., Forrer, P., Grütter, M. G., & Plückthun, A. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt962 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Ma, B., Elkayam, T., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1030237100 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
The structural basis of antibody–antigen recognition
Sela-Culang, I., Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00302 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Keskin, O., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.077 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Visualization of transient encounter complexes in protein–protein association
Tang, C., Iwahara, J., & Clore, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05201 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level
Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N., & Gursoy, A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
BeAtMuSiC: prediction of changes in protein–protein binding affinity on mutations
Dehouck, Y., Kwasigroch, J. M., Rooman, M., & Gilis, D. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt450 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution
Levy, E. D. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Proteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly
Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Empereur-Mot, C., Elad, N., & Levy, E. D. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23320 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
West, A. P., Bennett, M. J., Sellers, V. M., Andrews, N. C., Enns, C. A., & Bjorkman, P. J. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c000664200 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Birtalan, S., Zhang, Y., Fellouse, F. A., Shao, L., Schaefer, G., & Sidhu, S. S. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.093 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Human Cancer Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Structural Perspective
Kar, G., Gursoy, A., & Keskin, O. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000601 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
De novo protein design enables the precise induction of RSV-neutralizing antibodies
Sesterhenn, F., Yang, C., Bonet, J., Cramer, J. T., Wen, X., Wang, Y., Chiang, C.-I., Abriata, L. A., Kucharska, I., Castoro, G., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay5051 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Prediction of aggregation prone regions of therapeutic proteins
Chennamsetty, N., Voynov, V., Kayser, V., Helk, B., & Trout, B. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp911706q · Cited by 200 · see citing works
<scp>AB</scp> ‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions
Sirin, S., Apgar, J. R., Bennett, E. M., & Keating, A. E. (2016) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2829 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
State-of-the-art strategies for targeting protein–protein interactions by small-molecule inhibitors
Sheng, C., Dong, G., Miao, Z., Zhang, W., & Wang, W. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00252d · Cited by 165 · see citing works
London, N., Raveh, B., Movshovitz‐Attias, D., & Schueler‐Furman, O. (2010) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22785 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Gao, M., & Skolnick, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1012820107 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Myostatin and its Regulation: A Comprehensive Review of Myostatin Inhibiting Strategies
Baig, M. H., Ahmad, K., Moon, J. S., Park, S.-Y., Ho Lim, J., Chun, H. J., Qadri, A. F., Hwang, Y. C., Jan, A. T., Ahmad, S. S., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.876078 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Structural Basis for Interactions between Tenascins and Lectican C-Type Lectin Domains
Lundell, A., Olin, A. I., Mörgelin, M., al-Karadaghi, S., Aspberg, A., & Logan, D. T. (2004) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Atomic Analysis of Protein-Protein Interfaces with Known Inhibitors: The 2P2I Database
Bourgeas, R., Basse, M.-J., Morelli, X., & Roche, P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009598 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Mechanism for Multiple Ligand Recognition by the Human Transferrin Receptor
Giannetti, A. M., Snow, P. M., Zak, O., & Björkman, P. J. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000051 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Targeting Protein–Protein Interactions and Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Valkov, E., Sharpe, T., Marsh, M., Greive, S., & Hyvönen, M. (2011) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2011_265 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein–protein interfaces
Gao, M., & Skolnick, J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq404 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kunik, V., & Ofran, Y. (2013) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzt027 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Bottom-up de novo design of functional proteins with complex structural features
Yang, C., Sesterhenn, F., Bonet, J., van Aalen, E. A., Scheller, L., Abriata, L. A., Cramer, J. T., Wen, X., Rosset, S., Georgeon, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-020-00699-x · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A credit-card library approach for disrupting protein–protein interactions
Xu, Y., Shi, J., Yamamoto, N., Moss, J. A., Vogt, P. K., & Janda, K. D. (2006) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.11.052 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
O’Brien, M. E., Murray, G., Gogoi, D., Yusuf, A., McCarthy, C., Wormald, M. R., Casey, M., Gabillard-Lefort, C., McElvaney, N. G., & Reeves, E. P. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23052441 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Wang, X., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0143-5 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Structure and reactivity of LpxD, the <i>N</i> -acyltransferase of lipid A biosynthesis
Buetow, L., Smith, T. K., Dawson, A., Fyffe, S., & Hunter, W. N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606356104 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Cierpicki, T., & Grembecka, J. (2015) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12244 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Aromatic components of two ferric enterobactin binding sites in <i>Escherichia coli</i> FepA
Cao, Z., Qi, Z., Sprencel, C., Newton, S. M. C., & Klebba, P. E. (2000) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02093.x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Structural determinants of co-translational protein complex assembly
Mallik, S., Venezian, J., Lobov, A., Heidenreich, M., Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Yeates, T. O., Shiber, A., & Levy, E. D. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.013 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Using statistical methods to model the fine-tuning of molecular machines and systems
Thorvaldsen, S., & Hössjer, O. (2020) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110352 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“They can interact with a variety of different molecules, but it is their simultaneous interactions with one another at the same location that account for many of the functions of the cell (Jones and Thornton, 1996).”
BackgroundDeep learning reveals many more inter-protein residue-residue contacts than direct coupling analysis
Zhou, T.-M., Wang, S., & Xu, J. (2017) · doi:10.1101/240754 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Refinement of protein-protein complexes in contact map space with metadynamics simulations
Pfeiffenberger, E., & Bates, P. A. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25612 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zheng, F., Jiang, X., Wen, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, M. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.018 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Reliable prediction of protein–protein binding affinity changes upon mutations with Pythia-PPI
Tao, F., Sun, J., Gao, P., Gao, G. F., & Wu, B. (2025) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf231 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Protein-Protein Interactions as Drug Targets
Wendt, M. D. (2012) · Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28965-1_1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Thornton, J M
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1996-01-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC40170
- OpenAlex
- W2031772330
- Cited by
- 2,684
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 117
- FWCI
- 16.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, protein complexes, protein-protein recognition, homodimer, heterodimer, enzyme-inhibitor complex, protein structure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Solubility, Structure-Activity Relationship, Protein Structure, Secondary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Macromolecular Substances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review