The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular mechanisms for the conversion of zymogens to active proteolytic enzymes
Open accessAbstract
Proteolytic enzymes are synthesized as inactive precursors, or “zymogens,” to prevent unwanted protein degradation, and to enable spatial and temporal regulation of proteolytic activity. Upon sorting or appropriate compartmentalization, zymogen conversion to the active enzyme typically involves limited proteolysis and removal of an “activation segment.” The sizes of activation segments range from dipeptide units to independently folding domains comprising more than 100 residues. A common form of the activation segment is an N‐terminal extension of the mature enzyme, or “prosegment,” that sterically blocks the active site, and thereby prevents binding of substrates. In addition to their inhibitory role, prosegments are frequently important for the folding, stability, and/or intracellular sorting of the zymogen. The mechanisms of conversion to active enzymes are diverse in nature, ranging from enzymatic or nonenzymatic cofactors that trigger activation, to a simple change in pH that results in conversion by an autocatalytic mechanism. Recent X‐ray crystallographic studies of zymogens and comparisons with their active counterparts have identified the structural changes that accompany conversion. This review will focus upon the structural basis for inhibition by activation segments, as well as the molecular events that lead to the conversion of zymogens to active enzymes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Christianson, D. W., & Lipscomb, W. N. (1989) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar00158a003 · Cited by 606
Rudenko, G., Bonten, E., d'Azzo, A., & GJ Hol, W. (1995) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00260-x · Cited by 97
Cited by
The 26S Proteasome: A Molecular Machine Designed for Controlled Proteolysis
Voges, D., Zwickl, P., & Baumeister, W. (1999) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.1015 · Cited by 1,608
Activity-Based Protein Profiling: From Enzyme Chemistry to Proteomic Chemistry
Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., & Kozarich, J. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125 · Cited by 1,270
Expression Analysis of BACE2 in Brain and Peripheral Tissues
Bennett, B. D., Babu-Khan, S., Loeloff, R., Louis, J.-C., Curran, E., Citron, M., & Vassar, R. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m002688200 · Cited by 317
Structural basis of BRCC36 function in DNA repair and immune regulation
Rabl, J., Bunker, R. D., Schenk, A. D., Cavadini, S., Gill, M. E., Abdulrahman, W., Andrés-Pons, A., Luijsterburg, M. S., Ibrahim, A. F. M., Branigan, E., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.002 · Cited by 84
Domingos, A., Cardoso, P. C., Xue, Z., Clemente, A., Brodelius, P. E., & Pais, M. S. (2000) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2000.01780.x · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, A. R., & James, M. N. G.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 815-836
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2083699890
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular mechanisms for the conversion of zymogens to active proteolytic enzymes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pro.5560070401
- The paper
- Khan, A. R., & James, M. N. G. (1998). Molecular mechanisms for the conversion of zymogens to active proteolytic enzymes. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560070401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.