Cited by 1,270Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsClick Chemistry and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

Activity-Based Protein Profiling: From Enzyme Chemistry to Proteomic Chemistry

Cravatt, Benjamin F., Wright, Aaron T., Kozarich, John W.·2008·Annual Review of Biochemistry

Abstract

Genome sequencing projects have provided researchers with a complete inventory of the predicted proteins produced by eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. Assignment of functions to these proteins represents one of the principal challenges for the field of proteomics. Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) has emerged as a powerful chemical proteomic strategy to characterize enzyme function directly in native biological systems on a global scale. Here, we review the basic technology of ABPP, the enzyme classes addressable by this method, and the biological discoveries attributable to its application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ABPP was pioneered by Cravatt and Bogyo using active-site-directed chemical probes that covalently target catalytic residues of hydrolases, proteases, and kinases.

    “ABPP was pioneered by Cravatt and Bogyo using active-site-directed chemical probes that covalently target catalytic residues of various enzyme classes, including hydrolases, proteases and kinases173,174.”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [173]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., & Kozarich, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Activx Biosciences, La Jolla, California 92037;
Venue
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
383-414
ISSN
  • 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4509
OpenAlex
W2149554987
Cited by
1,270
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 73
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-017259, P01DA017259)
  • National Cancer Institute (R33CA118696, CA-087660, CA118696, R01CA087660)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
activity-based protein profiling, chemoproteomics, enzyme function, enzyme classes, protein annotation
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Biochemistry, Chromatography, Liquid, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Humans, Hydrolases, Models, Biological, Models, Chemical, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry, Genome, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review