Cited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

GDFold2 : A fast and parallelizable protein folding environment with freely defined objective functions

Open access
Mi, Tianyu, Xiao, Nan, Gong, Haipeng·2025·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

An important step of mainstream protein structure prediction is to model the 3D protein structure based on the predicted 2D inter‐residue geometric information. This folding step has been integrated into a unified neural network to allow end‐to‐end training in state‐of‐the‐art methods like AlphaFold2, but is separately implemented using the Rosetta folding environment in some traditional methods like trRosetta. Despite the inferiority in prediction accuracy, the conventional approach allows for the sampling of various protein conformations compatible with the predicted geometric constraints, partially capturing the dynamic information. Here, we propose GDFold2, a novel protein folding environment, to address the limitations of Rosetta. On the one hand, GDFold2 is highly computationally efficient, capable of accomplishing multiple folding processes in parallel within the time scale of minutes for generic proteins. On the other hand, GDFold2 supports freely defined objective functions to fulfill diversified optimization requirements. Moreover, we propose a quality assessment (QA) model to provide reliable prediction on the quality of protein structures folded by GDFold2, thus substantially simplifying the selection of structural models. GDFold2 and the QA model could be combined to investigate the transition path between protein conformational states, and the online server is available at https://structpred.life.tsinghua.edu.cn/server_gdfold2.html .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70041

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mi, T., Xiao, N., & Gong, H.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, Haipeng
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01-28
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
e70041-e70041
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4406914184
Cited by
1
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2023YFF1204400)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein folding, protein structure prediction, Rosetta, quality evaluation model
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review