Cited by 458Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning

Open access
Chowdhury, Ratul, Bouatta, Nazim, Biswas, Surojit, Floristean, Christina, Kharkar, Anant, Roy, Koushik, Rochereau, Charlotte, Ahdritz, Gustaf +4 more·2022·Nature Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

AlphaFold2 and related computational systems predict protein structure using deep learning and co-evolutionary relationships encoded in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Despite high prediction accuracy achieved by these systems, challenges remain in (1) prediction of orphan and rapidly evolving proteins for which an MSA cannot be generated; (2) rapid exploration of designed structures; and (3) understanding the rules governing spontaneous polypeptide folding in solution. Here we report development of an end-to-end differentiable recurrent geometric network (RGN) that uses a protein language model (AminoBERT) to learn latent structural information from unaligned proteins. A linked geometric module compactly represents C α backbone geometry in a translationally and rotationally invariant way. On average, RGN2 outperforms AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold on orphan proteins and classes of designed proteins while achieving up to a 10 6-fold reduction in compute time. These findings demonstrate the practical and theoretical strengths of protein language models relative to MSAs in structure prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23]Ingraham J, Riesselman A, Sander C. & Marks D. Learning protein structure with a differentiable simulator. in 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019 (2019).
  2. [33]Elnaggar A. CodeTrans: Towards Cracking the Language of Silicone’s Code Through Self-Supervised Deep Learning and High Performance Computing. bioRxiv 14, (2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Floristean, C., Kharkar, A., Roy, K., Rochereau, C., Ahdritz, G., Zhang, J., Church, G. M., Sorger, P. K., & AlQuraishi, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bouatta, Nazim
  • Sorger, Peter K.
  • AlQuraishi, Mohammed
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2022-10-03
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1617-1623
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W4300861364
Cited by
455
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 7
FWCI
32.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011, HR0011-19-2-0022)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA225088)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure prediction, protein language models, orphan proteins, protein design, computational efficiency
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Language, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review