Cited by 97Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

DSSP 4: FAIR annotation of protein secondary structure

Open access
Hekkelman, Maarten L., Salmoral, Daniel Álvarez, Perrakis, Anastassis, Joosten, Robbie P.·2025·Protein Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein secondary structure annotation is essential for understanding protein architecture, serving as a cornerstone for structural classification, alignment, visualization, and machine learning applications. The Define Secondary Structure of Proteins (DSSP) algorithm has long been the standard for assigning secondary structure elements such as α‐helices, β ‐sheets, and loops in protein models. Here, we introduce DSSP version 4, which recapitulates DSSP functionality in a modern computational framework, extending also to the detection of left‐handed κ‐helices (Poly‐Proline II helices). To align with the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable principles, DSSP 4 adopts mmCIF as its primary input and output format, while retaining compatibility with legacy Protein Data Bank (PDB) and DSSP formats. We applied this updated tool to analyze the distribution of secondary structure elements across the PDB, differentiating structures from diverse experimental methods, revealing insights into the prevalence and length of secondary structure elements, including the newly annotated κ‐helices. The DSSP 4 software, databank, and server are freely accessible from https://pdb-redo.eu/dssp , ensuring broad utility and interoperability in structural biology research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70208

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hekkelman, M. L., Salmoral, D. Á., Perrakis, A., & Joosten, R. P.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Department of Biochemistry Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Joosten, Robbie P.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-07-17
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
e70208-e70208
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4412487985
Cited by
97
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 16
FWCI
29.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
alpha-helix, beta-sheet, mmCIF, FAIR principles, Protein Data Bank, protein structure classification
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Software, Protein Structure, Secondary, Databases, Protein, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review