The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning Gauged Supergravity
Abstract
Type IIB string theory on a 5‐sphere gives rise to gauged supergravity in five dimensions. Motivated by the fact that this is the context of the most widely studied example of the AdS/CFT correspondence, we undertake an investigation of its critical points. The scalar manifold is an coset, and the challenge is that it is 42‐dimensional. We take a Machine Learning approach to the problem using TensorFlow, and this results in a substantial increase in the number of known critical points. Our list of 32 critical points contains all five of the previously known ones, including an supersymmetric point identified by Khavaev, Pilch and Warner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Casimir source as the crucial negative contribution in the potential is quantum, similarly to [55], but perturbative, with explicitly known stress energy contributions to the equations of motion (as in other backgrounds such as [39,70]).”
From Hyperbolic compactification of M-theory and de Sitter quantum gravity (2022) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1999) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1026654312961 · Cited by 6,704
Stability in gauged extended supergravity
Breitenlohner, P., & Freedman, D. Z. (1982) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6 · Cited by 1,707
De Wit, B., & Nicolai, H. (1982) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90120-1 · Cited by 612
The consistency of the S7 truncation in d=11 supergravity
De Wit, B., & Nicolai, H. (1987) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90253-7 · Cited by 343
Compact and non-compact gauged supergravity theories in five dimensions
Günaydin, M., Romans, L. J., & Warner, N. P. (1986) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90237-3 · Cited by 301
Gauged N = 8 supergravity in five dimensions
Günaydin, M., Romans, L. J., & Warner, N. P. (1985) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90361-2 · Cited by 254
Some new extrema of the scalar potential of gauged N = 8 supergravity
Warner, N. P. (1983) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90383-0 · Cited by 237
New vacua of gauged supergravity in five dimensions
Khavaev, A., Pilch, K., & Warner, N. P. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00795-4 · Cited by 214
Gauged N = 8 d = 5 supergravity
Pernici, M., Pilch, K., & van Nieuwenhuizen, P. (1985) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90645-5 · Cited by 196
The parallelizing S7 torsion in gauged N=8 supergravity
Bernard De Wit, A., & Nicolai, H. (1984) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90517-0 · Cited by 160
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- J.Distler F.Zamora [hep‐th/9810206]. · arXiv
Cited by
Hyperbolic compactification of M-theory and de Sitter quantum gravity
De Luca, G. B., Silverstein, E., & Torroba, G. (2022) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.3.083 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnan, C., Mohan, V., & Ray, S.
- Affiliations
- Center for High Energy Physics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 India
- Venue
- Fortschritte der Physik
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-19
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0015-8208
- 1521-3978
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 17
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning Gauged Supergravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prop.202000027
- The paper
- Krishnan, C., Mohan, V., & Ray, S. (2020). Machine Learning Gauged Supergravity. Fortschritte der Physik. https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202000027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
