Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: A population‐based analysis

Gandaglia, Giorgio, Abdollah, Firas, Schiffmann, Jonas, Trudeau, Vincent, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Kim, Simon P., Perrotte, Paul, Montorsi, Francesco, Briganti, Alberto, Trinh, Quoc‐Dien, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Sun, Maxine·2014·The Prostate

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is few data on what constitutes the distribution of metastatic sites in prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of our study was to systematically describe the most common sites of metastases in a contemporary cohort of PCa patients. METHODS: Patients with metastatic PCa were abstracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998–2010). Most common metastatic sites within the entire population were described. Stratification was performed according to the presence of single or multiple (≥2 sites) metastases. Additionally, we evaluated the distribution of metastatic sites amongst patients with and without bone metastases. RESULTS: Overall, 74,826 patients with metastatic PCa were identified. The most common metastatic sites were bone (84%), distant lymph nodes (10.6%), liver (10.2%), and thorax (9.1%). Overall, 18.4% of patients had multiple metastatic sites involved. When stratifying patients according to the site of metastases, only 19.4% of men with bone metastases had multiple sites involved. Conversely, among patients with lymph nodes, liver, thorax, brain, digestive system, retroperitoneum, and kidney and adrenal gland metastases the proportion of men with multiple sites involved was 43.4%, 76.0%, 76.7%, 73.0%, 52.2%, 60.9%, and 76.4%, respectively. When focusing exclusively on patients with bone metastases, the most common sites of secondary metastases were liver (39.1%), thorax (35.2%), distant lymph nodes (24.6%), and brain (12.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients with metastatic PCa experience bone location, the proportion of patients with atypical metastases is not negligible. These findings might be helpful when planning diagnostic imaging procedures in patients with advanced PCa. Prostate 74:210–216, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pros.22742

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Gandaglia, G., Abdollah, F., Schiffmann, J., Trudeau, V., Shariat, S. F., Kim, S. P., Perrotte, P., Montorsi, F., Briganti, A., Trinh, Q., Karakiewicz, P. I., & Sun, M.
Venue
The Prostate
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-16
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
210-216
ISSN
  • 0270-4137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0045
OpenAlex
W1588197864
Cited by
560
References
20
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: A population‐based analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pros.22742
The paper
Gandaglia, G., Abdollah, F., Schiffmann, J., Trudeau, V., Shariat, S. F., Kim, S. P., Perrotte, P., Montorsi, F., Briganti, A., Trinh, Q., Karakiewicz, P. I., & Sun, M. (2014). Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: A population‐based analysis. The Prostate. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.22742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.