The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent
Open accessAbstract
We present a CPU efficient protocol for refinement of protein structures in a thin layer of explicit solvent and energy parameters with completely revised dihedral angle terms. Our approach is suitable for protein structures determined by theoretical (e.g., homology modeling or threading) or experimental methods (e.g., NMR). In contrast to other recently proposed refinement protocols, we put a strong emphasis on consistency with widely accepted covalent parameters and computational efficiency. We illustrate the method for NMR structure calculations of three proteins: interleukin‐4, ubiquitin, and crambin. We show a comparison of their structure ensembles before and after refinement in water with and without a force field energy term for the dihedral angles; crambin was also refined in DMSO. Our results demonstrate the significant improvement of structure quality by a short refinement in a thin layer of solvent. Further, they show that a dihedral angle energy term in the force field is beneficial for structure calculation and refinement. We discuss the optimal weight for the energy constant for the backbone angle omega and include an extensive discussion of meaning and relevance of the calculated validation criteria, in particular root mean square Z scores for covalent parameters such as bond lengths. Proteins 2003;50:496–506. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889892009944 · Cited by 24,581
Cited by
Global analysis of protein folding using massively parallel design, synthesis, and testing
Rocklin, G. J., Chidyausiku, T. M., Goreshnik, I., Ford, A., Houliston, S., Lemak, A., Carter, L., Ravichandran, R., Mulligan, V. K., Chevalier, A., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan0693 · Cited by 501
Principles for designing ideal protein structures
Koga, N., Tatsumi-Koga, R., Liu, G., Xiao, R., Acton, T. B., Montelione, G. T., & Baker, D. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11600 · Cited by 564
Zanier, K., ould M'hamed ould Sidi, A., Boulade-Ladame, C., Rybin, V., Chappelle, A., Atkinson, A., Kieffer, B., & Travé, G. (2012) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.02.001 · Cited by 125
Solution NMR Structure and Histone Binding of the PHD Domain of Human MLL5
Lemak, A., Yee, A., Wu, H., Yap, D., Zeng, H., Dombrovski, L., Houliston, S., Aparicio, S., & Arrowsmith, C. H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077020 · Cited by 36
Familial scaphocephaly syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the FGFR2 tyrosine kinase domain
McGillivray, G., Savarirayan, R., Cox, T. C., Stojkoski, C., McNeil, R., Bankier, A., Bateman, J. F., Roscioli, T., Gardner, R. J. M., & Lamandé, S. R. (2005) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2004.027888 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Linge, J. P., Williams, M. A., Spronk, C. A. E. M., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Nilges, M.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 496-506
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2119034696
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.