Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Virtual screening using molecular simulations

Open access
Yang, Tianyi, Wu, Johnny C., Yan, Chunli, Wang, Yuanfeng, Luo, Ray, Gonzales, Michael B., Dalby, Kevin N., Ren, Pengyu·2011·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Effective virtual screening relies on our ability to make accurate prediction of protein‐ligand binding, which remains a great challenge. In this work, utilizing the molecular‐mechanics Poisson‐Boltzmann (or Generalized Born) surface area approach, we have evaluated the binding affinity of a set of 156 ligands to seven families of proteins, trypsin β, thrombin α, cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK), cAMP‐dependent kinase (PKA), urokinase‐type plasminogen activator, β‐glucosidase A, and coagulation factor Xa. The effect of protein dielectric constant in the implicit‐solvent model on the binding free energy calculation is shown to be important. The statistical correlations between the binding energy calculated from the implicit‐solvent approach and experimental free energy are in the range of 0.56–0.79 across all the families. This performance is better than that of typical docking programs especially given that the latter is directly trained using known binding data whereas the molecular mechanics is based on general physical parameters. Estimation of entropic contribution remains the barrier to accurate free energy calculation. We show that the traditional rigid rotor harmonic oscillator approximation is unable to improve the binding free energy prediction. Inclusion of conformational restriction seems to be promising but requires further investigation. On the other hand, our preliminary study suggests that implicit‐solvent based alchemical perturbation, which offers explicit sampling of configuration entropy, can be a viable approach to significantly improve the prediction of binding free energy. Overall, the molecular mechanics approach has the potential for medium to high‐throughput computational drug discovery. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.23018

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Yang, T., Wu, J. C., Yan, C., Wang, Y., Luo, R., Gonzales, M. B., Dalby, K. N., & Ren, P.
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-12
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
1940-1951
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W2112855704
Cited by
202
References
8
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.