The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins
Abstract
A new approach is introduced for analyzing and ultimately predicting protein structures, defined at the level of Cα coordinates. We analyze hexamers (oligopeptides of six amino acid residues) and show that their structure tends to concentrate in specific clusters rather than vary continuously. Thus, we can use a limited set ofstandard structural building blocks taken from these clusters as representatives of the repertoire of observed hexamers. We demonstrate that protein structures can be approximated by concatenating such building blocks. We have identified about 100 building blocks by applying clustering algorithms, and have shown that they can “replace” about 76% ofall hexamers in well‐refined known proteins with an error of less than 1 Å, and can be joined together to cover 99% of the residues. After replacing each hexamer by a standard building block with similar conformation, we can approximately reconstruct the actual structure by smoothly joining the overlapping building blocks into a full protein. The reconstructed structures show, in most cases, high resemblance to the original structure, although using a limited number of building blocks and local criteria of concatenating them is not likely to produce a very precise global match. Since these building blocks reflect, in many cases, some sequence dependency, it may be possible to use the results of this study as a basis for a protein structure prediction procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“The basis of modeling by coordinate reconstruction is the finding that most hexapeptide segments of protein structure can be clustered into only 100 structurally different classes (Jones and Thirup, 1986; Claessens et al., 1989; Unger et al., 1989; Levitt, 1992; Bystroff and Baker, 1998).”
BackgroundUnsupervised learning reveals landscape of local structural motifs across protein classes
(2025) · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf377 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Unger, R., Harel, D., Wherland, S., & Sussman, J. L.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 355-373
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2135484509
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.340050410
- The paper
- Unger, R., Harel, D., Wherland, S., & Sussman, J. L. (1989). A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340050410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.