Cited by 730Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER

Webb, Benjamin, Sali, Andrej·2016·Current Protocols in Protein Science

Abstract

Abstract Comparative protein structure modeling predicts the three‐dimensional structure of a given protein sequence (target) based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins of known structure (templates). The prediction process consists of fold assignment, target‐template alignment, model building, and model evaluation. This unit describes how to calculate comparative models using the program MODELLER and how to use the ModBase database of such models, and discusses all four steps of comparative modeling, frequently observed errors, and some applications. Modeling lactate dehydrogenase from Trichomonas vaginalis (TvLDH) is described as an example. The download and installation of the MODELLER software is also described. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpps.20

Cites

224 of 224 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antibody structures have conventionally been predicted using either physics-based modeling, such as MD simulations, or homology-based modeling, or a combined method, such as MODELLER.

    “Antibody structures have conventionally been predicted using either physics-based modeling, such as MD simulations [38], or homologybased modeling [39], or a combined method, such as MODELLER [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, B., & Sali, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California at San Francisco San Francisco California
Venue
Current Protocols in Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11
Volume
86
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1934-3655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-3663
OpenAlex
W4211232835
Cited by
730
References
224
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
31.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Protocols in Protein Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
comparative protein structure modeling, MODELLER, protein structure prediction, model development, model evaluation, lactate dehydrogenase, Trichomonas vaginalis, protein templates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review