The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secondary structure‐based profiles: Use of structure‐conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities
Abstract
The profile method, for detecting distantly related proteins by sequence comparison, has been extended to incorporate secondary structure information from know X‐ray structures. The sequence of a known structure is aligned to sequences of other members of a given folding class. From the known structure, the secondary structure (α‐helix, β‐strand or “other”) is assigned to each position of the aligned sequences. As in the standard profile method,1 a position‐dependent scoring table, termed a profile, is calculated from the aligned sequences. However, rather than using the standard Dayhoff mutation table in calculating the profile, we use distinct amino acid mutation tables for residues in α‐helices, β‐strands or other secondary structures to calculate the profile. In addition, we also distinguish between internal and external residues. With this new secondary structure‐based profile method, we created a profile for eight‐stranded, antiparallel β barrels of the insecticyanin folding class. It is based on the sequences of retinol‐binding protein, insecticyanin and β‐lactoglobulin. Scanning the sequence database with this profile, it was possible to detect the sequence of avidin. The structure of streptavidin is known, and it appears to be distantly related to the antiparallel β barrels. Also detected is the sequence of complement component C8, which we therefore predict to be a member of this folding class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three‐dimensional structure of retinol‐binding protein.
Newcomer, M. E., Jones, T. A., Aqvist, J., Sundelin, J., Eriksson, U., Rask, L., & Peterson, P. A. (1984) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01995.x · Cited by 405
Cited by
A Method to Identify Protein Sequences That Fold into a Known Three-Dimensional Structure
Bowie, J. U., Lüthy, R., & Eisenberg, D. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1853201 · Cited by 2,851
Self-citationAminotransferases: demonstration of homology and division into evolutionary subgroups
MEHTA, P. K., HALE, T. I., & CHRISTEN, P. (1993) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17953.x · Cited by 401
Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory.
Goldstein, R. A., Luthey-Schulten, Z. A., & Wolynes, P. G. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.11.4918 · Cited by 344
Assessing the Impact of Secondary Structure and Solvent Accessibility on Protein Evolution
Goldman, N., Thorne, J. L., & Jones, D. T. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/149.1.445 · Cited by 281
De novo and inverse folding predictions of protein structure and dynamics
Godzik, A., Kolinski, A., & Skolnick, J. (1993) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/bf02337559 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Lüthy, R., McLachlan, A. D., & Eisenberg, D.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-239
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2002640757
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.