Cited by 2,851Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

A Method to Identify Protein Sequences That Fold into a Known Three-Dimensional Structure

Bowie, James U., Lüthy, Roland, Eisenberg, David·1991·Science

Abstract

The inverse protein folding problem, the problem of finding which amino acid sequences fold into a known three-dimensional (3D) structure, can be effectively attacked by finding sequences that are most compatible with the environments of the residues in the 3D structure. The environments are described by: (i) the area of the residue buried in the protein and inaccessible to solvent; (ii) the fraction of side-chain area that is covered by polar atoms (O and N); and (iii) the local secondary structure. Examples of this 3D profile method are presented for four families of proteins: the globins, cyclic AMP (adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate) receptor-like proteins, the periplasmic binding proteins, and the actins. This method is able to detect the structural similarity of the actins and 70- kilodalton heat shock proteins, even though these protein families share no detectable sequence similarity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1853201

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The principle that tertiary structure models aid structural template retrieval has long been understood and is the basis of protein threading.

    “Of course, this principle has been well understood for some time, and is the basis of protein threading (45,46), but the ease and speed with which a rough candidate model can be generated for a query sequence has the potential to accelerate and improve the sensitivity of structural template searches.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowie, J. U., Lüthy, R., & Eisenberg, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1991-07-12
Volume
253
Issue
5016
Pages
164-170
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4246356731
Cited by
2,851
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 60
FWCI
24.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein sequence identification, buried surface area, side chain polarity, globin, periplasmic binding protein, actin
MeSH terms
Actins, Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Myoglobin, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Receptors, Cyclic AMP, Structure-Activity Relationship, Molecular Structure, Escherichia coli Proteins, Periplasmic Binding Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review