The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions
Abstract
Protein structural flexibility is important for catalysis, binding, and allostery. Flexibility has been predicted from amino acid sequence with a sliding window averaging technique and applied primarily to epitope search. New prediction parameters were derived from 92 refined protein structures in an unbiased selection of the Protein Data Bank by developing further the method of Karplus and Schulz (Naturwissenschaften 72:212–213, 1985). The accuracy of four flexibility prediction techniques was studied by comparing atomic temperature factors of known three‐dimensional protein structures to predictions by using correlation coefficients. The size of the prediction window was optimized for each method. Predictions made with our new parameters, using an optimized window size of 9 residues in the prediction window, were giving the best results. The difference from another previously used technique was small, whereas two other methods were much poorer. Applicability of the predictions was also tested by searching for known epitopes from amino acid sequences. The best techniques predicted correctly 20 of 31 continuous epitopes in seven proteins. Flexibility parameters have previously been used for calculating protein average flexibility indices which are inversely correlated to protein stability. Indices with the new parameters showed better correlation to protein stability than those used previously; furthermore they had relationship even when the old parameters failed. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intrinsically disordered protein
Dunker, A. K., Lawson, J. D., Brown, C. J., Williams, R. M., Romero, P., Oh, J. S., Oldfield, C. J., Campen, A. M., Ratliff, C. M., Hipps, K. W., et al. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(00)00138-8 · Cited by 2,272
The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation
Iakoucheva, L. M. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh253 · Cited by 1,429
Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling
Uversky, V. N., Oldfield, C. J., & Dunker, A. K. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.747 · Cited by 847
Pejaver, V., Hsu, W., Xin, F., Dunker, A. K., Uversky, V. N., & Radivojac, P. (2014) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2494 · Cited by 349
Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity
Yang, L., Song, G., & Jernigan, R. L. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0902159106 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Vihinen, M., Torkkila, E., & Riikonen, P.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-149
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2149653886
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.340190207
- The paper
- Vihinen, M., Torkkila, E., & Riikonen, P. (1994). Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340190207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.