Cited by 260Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity

Open access
Yang, Lei, Song, Guang, Jernigan, Robert L.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Elastic network models (ENMs) are entropic models that have demonstrated in many previous studies their abilities to capture overall the important internal motions, with comparisons having been made against crystallographic B-factors and NMR conformational variabilities. ENMs have become an increasingly important tool and have been widely used to comprehend protein dynamics, function, and even conformational changes. However, reliance upon an arbitrary cutoff distance to delimit the range of interactions has presented a drawback for these models, because the optimal cutoff values can differ somewhat from protein to protein and can lead to quirks such as some shuffling in the order of the normal modes when applied to structures that differ only slightly. Here, we have replaced the requirement for a cutoff distance and introduced the more physical concept of inverse power dependence for the interactions, with a set of elastic network models that are parameter-free, with the distance cutoff removed. For small fluctuations about the native forms, the power dependence is the inverse square, but for larger deformations, the power dependence may become inverse 6th or 7th power. These models maintain and enhance the simplicity and generality of the original ENMs, and at the same time yield better predictions of crystallographic B-factors (both isotropic and anisotropic) and of the directions of conformational transitions. Thus, these parameter-free ENMs can be models of choice whenever elastic network models are used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0902159106

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our persistent homology analysis explains the optimal range of cutoff distances (i.e., rc = 7 Å to 8Å) for GNM in the literature very well.

    “Therefore, our persistent homology analysis explains the optimal range of cutoff distances (i.e., rc = 7 Å to 8Å) for GNM in the literature73 very well.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, L., Song, G., & Jernigan, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program,
  • Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
106
Issue
30
Pages
12347-12352
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2029118067
Cited by
260
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm081680-03)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM073095, R01-GM081680, R01GM072014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
protein dynamics, conformational change, parameter-free model, entropic model, normal mode analysis, internal motion
MeSH terms
Adenosine Monophosphate, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Models, Chemical, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Anisotropy, Crystallography, X-Ray, Entropy, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review