The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Torsion angle dynamics: Reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement
Abstract
A reduced variable conformational sampling strategy for macromolecules based on molecular dynamics in torsion angle space is evaluated using crystallographic refinement as a prototypical search problem. Bae and Haug's algorithm for constrained dynamics [Bae, D. S., Haug, E. J. A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics. Mech. Struct. Mach. 15:359–382, 1987], originally developed for robotics, was used. Their formulation solves the equations of motion exactly for arbitrary holonomic constraints, and hence differs from commonly used approximation algorithms. It uses gradients calculated in Cartesian coordinates, and thus also differs from internal coordinate formulations. Molecular dynamics can be carried out at significantly higher temperatures due to the elimination of the high frequency bond and angle vibrations. The sampling strategy presented here combines high temperature torsion angle dynamics with repeated trajectories using different initial velocities. The best solutions can be identified by the free R value, or the R value if experimental phase information is appropriately included in the refinement. Applications to crystallographic refinement show a significantly increased radius of convergence over conventional techniques. For a test system with diffraction data to 2 Å resolution, slow‐cooling protocols fail to converge if the backbone atom root mean square (rms) coordinate deviation from the crystal structure is greater than 1.25 Å, but torsion angle refinement can correct backbone atom rms coordinate deviations up to approximately 1.7 Å. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A real-space refinement procedure for proteins
Diamond, R. (1971) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739471000986 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine
Afonine, P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Mustyakimov, M., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A., Zwart, P. H., & Adams, P. D. (2012) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444912001308 · Cited by 5,511
Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 Å resolution
Sutton, R. B., Fasshauer, D., Jahn, R., & Brunger, A. T. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/26412 · Cited by 2,417
The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex
Xu, Z., Horwich, A. L., & Sigler, P. B. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41944 · Cited by 1,239
Macromolecular Modeling with Rosetta
Das, R., & Baker, D. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062906.171838 · Cited by 989
The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., Kapral, G. J., Grosse Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2011) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.07.005 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Rice, L. M., & BrüNger, A. T.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 277-290
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2132351632
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.