Cited by 236Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

A real-space refinement procedure for proteins

Diamond, R.·1971·Acta Crystallographica Section A

Abstract

This paper describes a procedure which optimizes the fitting of a `model' of a protein to an electron density map. The technique seeks to minimize ∫ (Qo−Qm)2dv where Qo is the observed electron density and Qm is a density associated with a model in terms of which the observed densities are interpreted. Qm consists of a Gaussian density centred on each atomic centre, and a floating background level. Interactions due to overlapping densities of neighbouring atoms are allowed for and the model is normally treated as a flexible chain so that bond lengths are conserved during movement. Alternatively, the atoms may be allowed to move independently. Site occupations and atomic radii are also refinable. The calculation is organized in terms of a `molten zone' of up to ten residues, which moves along the chain one residue at a time, linear or non-linear constraints being applied to preserve chain continuity at each end of the zone. Provision is made for the zone to become active or inactive in predetermined regions of the molecule. A difference map (Qo−Qm) is available at the end of the calculation, as is a molecular listing with revised coordinates and dihedral and inter-bond angles. Inter-bond angles may be treated either as constants or as variables, and if variable may be made elastically stiffer than dihedral angles. The procedure is well suited to maps of 2 to 3 Å resolution, but is not limited to this range. It has produced convergent shifts exceeding 1.5 Å in a map of 2 Å resolution, and, except for shifts exceeding 1 Å, convergence is essentially complete in one pass. The procedure has, so far, been applied to four proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0567739471000986

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coot primarily uses a real-space refinement system that only respects local geometry, whereas the Rosetta force field used by Foldit is much more extensive, including additional steric, electrostatic and solvation terms, as well as statistical potentials based on observed backbone torsions and side-chain rotamers.

    “Whereas Coot primarily uses a real-space refinement system15 that only respects local geometry, the Rosetta force field used by Foldit is much more extensive, including additional steric, electrostatic and solvation terms, as well as statistical potentials based on observed backbone torsions and side-chain rotamers6.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diamond, R.
Corresponding author
Diamond, R.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section A
Published
1971-09-01
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
436-452
ISSN
0567-7394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088774638
Cited by
236
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Crystallographica Section A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
protein structure refinement, real-space refinement, molten zone, difference maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review