The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane
Abstract
In recent years, the nation has recognized that critical infrastructure protection should consider not only the prevention of disruptive events but also the processes that infrastructure systems undergo to maintain functionality following disruptions. This more comprehensive approach has been termed critical infrastructure resilience. Given the occurrence of a particular disruptive event, the resilience of a system to that event is the system's ability to reduce efficiently both the magnitude and duration of the deviation from targeted system performance levels. Under the direction of the U. S. Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate, Sandia National Laboratories has developed a comprehensive resilience assessment framework for evaluating the resilience of infrastructure and economic systems. The framework includes a quantitative methodology that measures resilience costs that result from a disruption to infrastructure function. The framework also includes a qualitative analysis methodology that assesses system characteristics affecting resilience to provide insight and direction for potential improvements. This article describes the resilience assessment framework and demonstrates the utility of the assessment framework through application to two hypothetical scenarios involving the disruption of a petrochemical supply chain by hurricanes. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Resilient, Sustainable Systems
Fiksel, J. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0344819 · Cited by 831
Cited by
A review of definitions and measures of system resilience
Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 · Cited by 1,892
On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems
Arghandeh, R., von Meier, A., Mehrmanesh, L., & Mili, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.193 · Cited by 404
Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience
Cantelmi, R., Di Gravio, G., & Patriarca, R. (2021) · Environment Systems and Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09795-8 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Vugrin, E. D., Warren, D. E., & Ehlen, M. A.
- Venue
- Process Safety Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-14
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 280-290
- ISSN
- 1066-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5913
- OpenAlex
- W2025923297
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prs.10437
- The paper
- Vugrin, E. D., Warren, D. E., & Ehlen, M. A. (2011). A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane. Process Safety Progress. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.