The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolved glyphosate‐resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt
Abstract
Glyphosate is the world's most important herbicide, with many uses that deliver effective and sustained control of a wide spectrum of unwanted (weedy) plant species. Until recently there were relatively few reports of weedy plant species evolving resistance to glyphosate. Since 1996, the advent and subsequent high adoption of transgenic glyphosate‐resistant crops in the Americas has meant unprecedented and often exclusive use of glyphosate for weed control over very large areas. Consequently, in regions of the USA where transgenic glyphosate‐resistant crops dominate, there are now evolved glyphosate‐resistant populations of the economically damaging weed species Ambrosia artemissifolia L., Ambrosia trifida L., Amaranthus palmeri S Watson, Amaranthus rudis JD Sauer, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq) JD Sauer and various Conyza and Lolium spp. Likewise, in areas of transgenic glyphosate‐resistant crops in Argentina and Brazil, there are now evolved glyphosate‐resistant populations of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers and Euphorbia heterophylla L. respectively. As transgenic glyphosate‐resistant crops will remain very popular with producers, it is anticipated that glyphosate‐resistant biotypes of other prominent weed species will evolve over the next few years. Therefore, evolved glyphosate‐resistant weeds are a major risk for the continued success of glyphosate and transgenic glyphosate‐resistant crops. However, glyphosate‐resistant weeds are not yet a problem in many parts of the world, and lessons can be learnt and actions taken to achieve glyphosate sustainability. A major lesson is that maintenance of diversity in weed management systems is crucial for glyphosate to be sustainable. Glyphosate is essential for present and future world food production, and action to secure its sustainability for future generations is a global imperative. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally
Benbrook, C. M. (2016) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 · Cited by 1,890
“Shifts in weed communities favoring species less susceptible to glyphosate, coupled with the emergence of first, less sensitive, and eventually glyphosate-resistant weeds drove the incremental rise in the intensity of glyphosate applications on GE-HT crops [13, 10].”
BackgroundThe evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Schütte, G., Eckerstorfer, M., Rastelli, V., Reichenbecher, W., Restrepo-Vassalli, S., Ruohonen-Lehto, M., Saucy, A.-G. W., & Mertens, M. (2017) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0100-y · Cited by 249
Meftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
Testing for Complementarity: Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans and Conservation Tillage
Perry, E. D., Moschini, G., & Hennessy, D. A. (2016) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aaw001 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Powles, S. B.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-13
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 360-365
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2076421083
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolved glyphosate‐resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1525
- The paper
- Powles, S. B. (2008). Evolved glyphosate‐resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.