The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide
Abstract
Species of Orobanche and Striga are among the most damaging parasitic weed species worldwide, but there are few reliable statistics on the full extent of the economic losses they cause. The distribution, host range and economic importance of the major species of Orobanche and Striga are briefly summarised. A review of literature over the period since 1991 suggests that many million hectares are infested and that the losses amount to $ US billions annually. Unfortunately there are almost no fully reliable figures on which to base these figures precisely. Meanwhile, there is little evidence of any significant change in intensity, range or losses caused over this period. Any reduction in the importance of these damaging weeds is sporadic, and alleviation of the problems is mostly localised. Furthermore, while the importance of Orobanche species may be broadly static, Striga species on cereals continue to become more serious in many countries owing to continued loss of soil fertility. It is suggested that new techniques may be needed for measurement of the extent of losses caused by these genera and their economic impact. There is continued urgency to develop control measures appropriate to the farming systems involved, and to reduce the risk of spread of both groups of parasite to new areas. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strigolactones, a Novel Carotenoid-Derived Plant Hormone
Al-Babili, S., & Bouwmeester, H. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114759 · Cited by 852
Molecular mechanism of strigolactone perception by DWARF14
Nakamura, H., Xue, Y.-L., Miyakawa, T., Hou, F., Qin, H.-M., Fukui, K., Shi, X., Ito, E., Ito, S., Park, S.-H., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3613 · Cited by 378
Parasitic Weeds: A World Challenge
Parker, C. (2012) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-d-11-00068.1 · Cited by 265
Self-citationCardoso, C., Zhang, Y., Jamil, M., Hepworth, J., Charnikhova, T., Dimkpa, S. O. N., Meharg, C., Wright, M. H., Liu, J., Meng, X., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317360111 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, C.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 453-459
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2144166206
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.1713
- The paper
- Parker, C. (2009). Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1713
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.