Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toxicity and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interaction of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Nauen, Ralf, Ebbinghaus‐Kintscher, Ulrich, Schmuck, Richard·2001·Pest Management Science

Abstract

Acute oral and contact toxicity tests of imidacloprid, an insecticide acting agonistically on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), to adult honeybees, Apis mellifera L var carnica, were carried out by seven different European research facilities. Results indicated that the 48‐h oral LD 50 of imidacloprid is between 41 and >81 ng per bee, and the contact LD 50 between 49 and 102 ng per bee. The ingested amount of imidacloprid‐containing sucrose solution decreased with increasing imidacloprid concentrations and may be attributed to dose‐related sub‐lethal intoxication symptoms or to antifeedant responses. Some previously reported imidacloprid metabolites occuring at low levels in planta after seed dressing, ie olefine‐, 5‐OH‐ and 4,5‐OH‐imidacloprid, showed lower oral LD 50 values (>36, >49 and 159 ng per bee, respectively) compared with the concurrently tested parent molecule (41 ng per bee). The urea metabolite and 6‐chloronicotinic acid (6‐CNA) exhibited LD 50 values of >99 500 and >121 500 ng per bee, respectively. The pharmacological profile of the [3 H]imidacloprid binding site in honeybee head membrane preparations is consistent with that anticipated for a nAChR. IC 50 values for the displacement of [3 H]imidacloprid by several metabolites such as olefine, 5‐OH‐, 4,5‐OH‐imidacloprid, urea and 6‐CNA were 0.45, 24, 6600, >100 000, and >100 000 n M, respectively. Displacement of [3 H]imidacloprid by imidacloprid revealed an IC 50 value of 2.9 n M, thus correlating well with the observed acute oral toxicity of the compounds in honeybees. Neurons isolated from the antennal lobe of A mellifera and subjected to whole‐cell voltage clamp electrophysiology responded to the application of 100 µ M acetylcholine with a fast inward current of between 30 and 1600 pA at −70 mV clamp potential. Imidacloprid and two of the metabolites (olefine‐ and 5‐OH‐imidacloprid) acted agonistically on these neurons, whereas the others did not induce currents at test conencentrations up to 3 m M. The electrophysiological data revealed Hill coefficients of approximately 1, indicating a single binding site responsible for an activation of the receptor and no direct cooperativity or allosteric interaction with a second binding site. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ps.331

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Nauen, R., Ebbinghaus‐Kintscher, U., & Schmuck, R.
Venue
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06-27
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
577-586
ISSN
  • 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4998
OpenAlex
W2161515829
Cited by
287
References
2
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interaction of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.331
The paper
Nauen, R., Ebbinghaus‐Kintscher, U., & Schmuck, R. (2001). Toxicity and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interaction of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.