Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production

Gianessi, Leonard P·2013·Pest Management Science

Abstract

Herbicide use is increasingly being adopted around the world. Many developing countries (India, China, Bangladesh) are facing shortages of workers to hand weed fields as millions of people move from rural to urban areas. In these countries, herbicides are far cheaper and more readily available than labor for hand weeding. History shows that in industrializing countries in the past, including the United States, Germany, Japan and South Korea, the same phenomenon has occurred—as workers have left agriculture, herbicides have been adopted. It is inevitable that herbicide use will increase in sub‐Saharan Africa, not only because millions of people are leaving rural areas, creating shortages of hand weeders, but also because of the need to increase crop yields. Hand weeding has never been a very efficient method of weed control—often performed too late and not frequently enough. Uncontrolled weeds have been a major cause of low crop yields in sub‐Saharan Africa for a long time. In many parts of the world, herbicides are being increasingly used to replace tillage in order to improve environmental conditions. In comparison with tillage, herbicide use reduces erosion, fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient run‐off and conserves water. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ps.3598

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1046/j.1444-6162.2003.00105.x · doi:10.1046/j.1444-6162.2003.00105.x
  2. Masthan SC, 1989, Increasing the productivity of rice, maize and groundnut in farmers' fields in Andhra Pradesh through weed control, Pesticides, 23, 42
  3. Manda P, 2011, Evaluation report on the impact of spray service technology uptake on small‐scale farmer livelihoods in Zambia
  4. Prasad A, 2008, Integrated weed management in maize (Zea mays L.) and maize + blackgram, Indian J Weed Sci, 40, 191
  5. De Datta SK, 1997, Economic evaluation of modern weed control techniques in rice, Integrated Control of Weeds
  6. 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.024 · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.024
  7. 10.1079/9781845936334.0151 · doi:10.1079/9781845936334.0151
  8. Koch W, 1992, Impact of weeds on developing countries, Proc 1st Int Weed Control Congr
  9. 10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00003.x · doi:10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00003.x
  10. 10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00005.x · doi:10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00005.x
  11. Kim KU, 1981, Weeds and Weed Control in Asia
  12. Schroder D, 1984, The contribution of herbicides and other technologies to corn production in the corn belt region 1964–1979, N Cent J Agric Econ January
  13. 10.4141/cjps82-091 · doi:10.4141/cjps82-091
  14. Holm F, 2010, A brief history of herbicide use in western Canada, 17th Australas Weeds Conf, 26
  15. Blackshaw R, 2006, Evolving on‐farm weed management systems: the Canadian experience, 15th Aust Weeds Conf, 24
  16. 10.1071/EA05025 · DOI
  17. Llewellyn RS, 2009, Adoption of no‐till cropping practices in Australian grain growing regions
  18. 10.1093/jxb/erh154 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wylie P, 2008, High profit farming in Northern Australia
  20. Fykse H, 2000, Proc Wageningen Symp—Agricultural Effects on Ground and Surface Waters: Research at the Edge of Science and Society
  21. Riley H, 2006, Long‐term tillage trials on loam and clay soils in SE Norway: yield results for 1998–2004. Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists, NJF Seminar 378, 190
  22. 10.1111/wre.12004 · DOI
  23. 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.357 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.09.012 · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2011.09.012
  25. Moody K, 1997, Pest Management of Rice Farmers in Asia
  26. Marsh S, 2009, Herbicide use strategies and weed management options in Filipino and Australian cropping
  27. Ahmed GJU, 2001, Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conf—Weeds
  28. Mazid MA, 2001, Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conf—Weeds
  29. Singh PK, 2010, Biennial Conf Indian Soc Weed Sci—Recent Advances in Weed Science Research—2010
  30. Anjum T, Competition losses caused by Rumex dentatus L. and Chenopodium album L. in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Philipp Agric Scient, 93, 365
  31. Banga RS, 2003, Bioefficacy of flufecacet and sulfosulfuron alone and in combination against weed flora in wheat, Indian J Weed Sci, 35, 179
  32. Gautam RC, 2001, Wheat production assured success in battle against hunger and poverty, Indian Farming
  33. Ashiq M, 2006, Comparative efficacy of different herbicides to control grassy weeds in wheat, Pak J Weed Sci Res, 12, 157
  34. Khan A, 2005, Response of wheat to herbicides application and hand weeding under irrigated and non‐irrigated conditions, Pak J Weed Sci Res, 11, 1
  35. Johnson D, 2003, Weeds, Rice and Poor People in South Asia
  36. Toth SA, 2011, Population prosperity: India, Farm Chem Int
  37. Alha A, 2011, Recent developments in farm labour availability in India and reasons behind its short supply, Agric Econ Res Rev, 24, 381
  38. Chatrath R, 2006, International Symposium on Wheat Yield Potential: Challenges to International Wheat Breeding
  39. Frabotta D, 2011, India herbicide market to propel to double‐digit growth in crop protection value, Farm Chem Int
  40. Moody K, 1991, Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, 301
  41. Zhang CX, 2007, Herbicide usage and associated problems in China
  42. 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.01.007 · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2010.01.007
  43. Shad RA, 1993, Weed management studies in maize, Pak J Agric Res, 14, 44
  44. Hussain M, 2010, Comparative efficacy of new herbicides for weed control in maize (Zea mays L.), Int J Trop Agric, 28, 17
  45. Paller EC, 2001, Weed management in grain corn: comparing calendared treatments and use of weed control action indicators (WCAI), Philipp J Crop Sci, 27, 9
  46. Meng ECH, 2006, Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities
  47. Tareen MAK, 1991, Effect of Primextra herbicide on the productivity of maize grown under medium rainfed conditions, Pak J Agric Res, 12, 257
  48. Sohail A, 1993, Evaluation of some insecticides on maize against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe), Pak J Agric Res, 14, 393
  49. Joshi PK, 2005, Maize in India, in Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities
  50. 10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.still.2010.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Mazid MA, 2006, Improving rice‐based cropping systems in north‐west Bangladesh, 15th Aust Weeds Conf, 331
  53. Ho NK, 1996, Current status of rice herbicide use in the tropics, JIRCAS Int Symp Ser, 4, 77
  54. 10.1079/9781845936334.0177 · DOI
  55. Chenkin AF, 1975, VIII Int Congr—Plant Protection, 27
  56. Keiserukhshy MG, 1975, VIII International Congress of Plant Protection
  57. Zakharenko VA, 2004, Phytosanitary condition of agroecosystems and potential yield losses from harmful organisms in agriculture under conditions of Russia's multiform economy, Russ Agric Sci, 5, 13
  58. Zakharenko V, 2000, Bioeconomic methods and decision‐making models for herbicide use in Russian agriculture, 3rd Int Weed Science Congr
  59. Borona V, 2002, 12th Eur Weed Res Soc Symp
  60. Brookes G, 2012, The potential economic and environmental impact of using current GM traits in Ukraine arable crop production
  61. Lindeman M, Kazakhstan Wheat Production: an Overview
  62. 10.5367/oa.2011.0042 · doi:10.5367/oa.2011.0042
  63. Rodenburg J, 2009, Potential of herbicide resistant rice technologies for sub‐Saharan Africa, AgBioForum, 12, 313
  64. Akobundu IO, 1987, Weed Science in the Tropics: Principles and Practices
  65. 10.1080/09670870210149808 · DOI
  66. Kibata GN, 2002, Participatory development of weed management strategies in maize based cropping systems in Kenya, 13th Aust Weeds Conf, 343
  67. 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.013 · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.013
  68. Overfield D, 2001, Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conf—Weeds, 907
  69. Mavudzi Z, 2001, Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conf—Weeds, 169
  70. BensonJM Weeds in tropical crops: review of abstracts on constraints in production caused by weeds in maize rice sorghum‐millet groundnuts and cassava. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 32 (Suppl. 1) (1982).
  71. Chivinge OA, 1990, Weed science technological needs for the communal areas of Zimbabwe, Zambezia, 17, 133
  72. Muthamia JGN, 2001, Proc 7th Eastern and South Africa Regional Maize Conf, 468
  73. Dar WD, 2004, Managing agricultural intensification: the role of international research
  74. Maina JM, 2003, BCPC Int Congr—Crop Science and Technology, 993
  75. Kamara AY, 2012, Best practices for maize production in the West African savannas, IITA R4D Rev
  76. Mrabet R, 2007, No‐Till Research Rainfed Areas in Morocco
  77. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0_11 · DOI
  78. 10.1021/jf102652y · DOI
  79. Peiretti R, 1999, 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting
  80. Peiretti R, 2007, Conservation Agriculture Research in Argentina
  81. Peiretti R, 2004, The no till cropping system and its evolution toward the achievement of the MOSHPPA model principles, Proc World Soybean Congr, 282
  82. Pretty J, 2001, 47 Portraits of Sustainable Agriculture Projects and Initiatives
  83. Bolliger A, 2006, Taking stock of the Brazilian ‘zero‐till revolution’: a review of landmark research and farmers' practice, Adv Agron, 91, 48
  84. Ribeiro MFS, 2007, Conservation Agriculture Research in Brazil
  85. 10.1590/S0103-90162010000100015 · DOI
  86. 10.1186/2048-7010-1-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Gianessi, L. P.
Venue
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-09
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
1099-1105
ISSN
  • 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4998
OpenAlex
W2158947159
Cited by
461
References
0
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.3598
The paper
Gianessi, L. P. (2013). The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3598

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.