Cited by 50Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

How well will stacked transgenic pest/herbicide resistances delay pests from evolving resistance?

Gressel, Jonathan, Gassmann, Aaron J, Owen, Micheal DK·2017·Pest Management Science

Abstract

Resistance has evolved to single transgenic traits engineered into crops for arthropod and herbicide resistances, and can be expected to evolve to the more recently introduced pathogen resistances. Combining transgenes against the same target pest is being promoted as the solution to the problem. This solution will work if used pre-emptively, but where resistance has evolved to one member of a stack, resistance should easily evolve for the second gene in most cases. We propose and elaborate criteria that could be used to evaluate the value of stacked traits for pest resistance management. Stacked partners must: target the same pest species; be in a tandem construct to preclude segregation; be synchronously expressed in the same tissues; have similar tissue persistence; target pest species that are still susceptible to at least two stacked partners. Additionally, transgene products must not be degraded in the same manner, and there should be a lack of cross-resistance to stacked transgenes or to their products. With stacked herbicide resistance transgenes, both herbicides must be used and have the same persistence. If these criteria are followed, and integrated with other pest management practices, resistance may be considerably delayed. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ps.4425

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pyramid events, current Bt varieties expressing two or more insecticidal genes, are more effective in controlling target pests and help to slow down the evolution of resistance.

    “These so-called pyramid events are more effective in controlling the target pests and help to slow down the evolution of resistance (Gressel et al., 2017;Huang, 2015;Que et al., 2010;Zhao et al. 2005).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Gressel et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gressel, J., Gassmann, A. J., & Owen, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gressel, Jonathan
Venue
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-20
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
22-34
ISSN
  • 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4998
OpenAlex
W2511681954
Cited by
50
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pest Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
genetically modified crops, pest resistance management, herbicide resistance, cross-resistance, transgene persistence, tissue-specific gene expression, integrated pest management, pathogen resistance
MeSH terms
Animals, Insecticide Resistance, Pest Control, Biological, Time Factors, Crops, Agricultural, Transgenes, Evolution, Molecular, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review