The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age‐stage, two‐sex life table
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricus), is the most serious pest of peanuts in Taiwan. In order to devise an ecology‐based and cost‐effective control program, we collected life table data and consumption rates from larvae reared indoors at a constant temperature of 25°C, or outdoors at ambient temperatures during the spring and fall of 2010. A computer simulation was then used to project the population growth and damage potential of S. litura on peanuts. RESULTS: Laboratory‐reared S. litura individuals produced 3548 eggs/female, whereas those reared outdoors produced 3452 and 3072 eggs/female in the spring and fall, respectively. The intrinsic rate of increase was 0.1828, 0.1308 and 0.1545 day−1 , and the net consumption rate was 194.0, 132.2 and 166.6 cm 2 larva−1 at 25°C, in spring and fall, respectively. Population projection showed a faster growth and higher damage potential of S. litura in the fall. CONCLUSION: Population projections based on life tables and stage‐specific consumption rates can reveal the stage structure and damage potential of the pest population. Our results showed that monitoring data obtained by using pheromone traps were not in concordance with the damage potential of the pest population. This approach offers a promising tool for pest management. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
ON THE USE OF MATRICES IN CERTAIN POPULATION MATHEMATICS
LESLIE, P. H. (1945) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/33.3.183 · Cited by 2,671
The Intrinsic Rate of Natural Increase of an Insect Population
Birch, L. C. (1948) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/1605 · Cited by 2,579
STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE FOR DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN ABUNDANCE TIME SERIES OF 1198 SPECIES
Brook, B. W., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1445:soefdd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,082
Life-Table Analysis Incorporating Both Sexes and Variable Development Rates Among Individuals
Chi, H. (1988) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/17.1.26 · Cited by 1,587
Self-citationEntomology and pest management
Pedigo, L. P. (1989) · Cited by 1,207
TWO NEW METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF INSECT POPULATION ECOLOGY
Chı, H., & Liu, H. (1985) · Cited by 1,082
Economic Injury Levels in Theory and Practice
Pedigo, L. P., Hutchins, S. H., & Higley, L. G. (1986) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.002013 · Cited by 708
Chi, H., & Su, H.-Y. (2006) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1603/0046-225x-35.1.10 · Cited by 695
Self-citationWang, X., Johnson, M. W., Daane, K. M., & Nadel, H. (2009) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1603/022.038.0518 · Cited by 106
Heb-Bal, & Bangalore. (1970) · Cited by 25
Cited by
Higher predation risk for insect prey at low latitudes and elevations
Roslin, T., Hardwick, B., Novotny, V., Petry, W. K., Andrew, N. R., Asmus, A., Barrio, I. C., Basset, Y., Boesing, A. L., Bonebrake, T. C., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj1631 · Cited by 507
Wang, S. Y., Wu, L., Li, B., & Zhang, D. (2020) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/toz296 · Cited by 66
He, L., Zhao, S., Ali, A., Ge, S., & Wu, K. (2021) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/toab056 · Cited by 33
Ali, M. P., Haque, S. S., Hossain, M. M., Bari, M. N., Kabir, M. M. M., Roy, T. K., Datta, J., Howlader, M. T. H., Alam, S. N., & Krupnik, T. J. (2023) · CABI Agriculture and Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s43170-023-00162-6 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuan, S., Lee, C., & Chi, H.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-19
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 805-813
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2093751481
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
