Cited by 68Insect Utilization and EffectsAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthInsect Pest Control Strategies

Reproductive Potential and Nutritional Composition of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) Prepupae Reared on Different Organic Wastes

Wang, Sheng Yin, Wu, Lingli, Li, Baoling, Zhang, Dayu·2020·Journal of Economic Entomology

Abstract

Hermetia illucens L. (the black soldier fly) has received increased attention because of its great potential in converting organic waste into a renewable resource. The prepupae have high proportions of proteins and fats and can serve as feedstuff for livestock and as feedstock for biodiesel production. With the goal to upgrade the conversion of low-value organic wastes into high-value proteins and fat on a large scale, the effects of the feedstuffs food waste, pig manure, chicken manure, and cow dung on the reproductive potential and nutrient composition of H. illucens were evaluated. The intrinsic rate of increase of H. illucens fed food waste (0.1249 d−1) was significantly greater than the rate of those fed pig manure (0.1167 d−1), chicken manure (0.1154 d−1), and cow dung (0.1049 d−1). The ash content of H. illucens fed food waste (30.8 g·kg−1 lyophilized prepupa matter (LPM)) was significantly lower than that of those fed chicken manure (37.6 g·kg−1 LPM) and cow dung (49.5 g·kg−1 LPM). The contents of crude fat, 372.4 g·kg−1 LPM, and protein, 436.9 g·kg−1 LPM, in prepupae fed food waste were the highest among the four treatments. The reproductive performance and prepupal nutrient composition indicated that food waste was the most suitable feed for H. illucens. The results from this study further demonstrate that the prepupae of H. illucens have great potential for use as a protein and fat source in animal feeds and as biodiesel material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jee/toz296

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S. Y., Wu, L., Li, B., & Zhang, D.
Affiliations
  • College of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Dayu
Venue
Journal of Economic Entomology
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
527-537
ISSN
  • 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-291X
OpenAlex
W2990885479
Cited by
66
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (31701848)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LGN19C140007)
  • Research Foundation of Zhejiang A&F University (2012FR087, 2017FR007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, prepupae, organic waste, food waste, pig manure, chicken manure, cattle manure, intrinsic rate of increase, fertility, protein content, fat content, ash content, insect feed, biodiesel feedstock
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Cattle, Diptera, Female, Larva, Manure, Refuse Disposal, Simuliidae, Swine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review