The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms influencing the evolution of resistance to Qo inhibitor fungicides
Abstract
Fungicides inhibiting the mitochondrial respiration of plant pathogens by binding to the cytochrome bc1 enzyme complex (complex III) at the Qo site (Qo inhibitors, QoIs) were first introduced to the market in 1996. After a short time period, isolates resistant to QoIs were detected in field populations of a range of important plant pathogens including Blumeria graminis Speer f sp tritici, Sphaerotheca fuliginea (Schlecht ex Fr) Poll, Plasmopara viticola (Berk & MA Curtis ex de Bary) Berl & de Toni, Pseudoperonospora cubensis (Berk & MA Curtis) Rost, Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet and Venturia inaequalis (Cooke) Wint. In most cases, resistance was conferred by a point mutation in the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene leading to an amino‐acid change from glycine to alanine at position 143 (G143A), although additional mutations and mechanisms have been claimed in a number of organisms. Transformation of sensitive protoplasts of M fijiensis with a DNA fragment of a resistant M fijiensis isolate containing the mutation yielded fully resistant transformants, demonstrating that the G143A substitution may be the most powerful transversion in the cyt b gene conferring resistance. The G143A substitution is claimed not to affect the activity of the enzyme, suggesting that resistant individuals may not suffer from a significant fitness penalty, as was demonstrated in B graminis f sp tritici. It is not known whether this observation applies also for other pathogen species expressing the G143A substitution. Since fungal cells contain a large number of mitochondria, early mitotic events in the evolution of resistance to QoIs have to be considered, such as mutation frequency (claimed to be higher in mitochondrial than nuclear DNA), intracellular proliferation of mitochondria in the heteroplasmatic cell stage, and cell to cell donation of mutated mitochondria. Since the cyt b gene is located in the mitochondrial genome, inheritance of resistance in filamentous fungi is expected to be non‐Mendelian and, therefore, in most species uniparental. In the isogamous fungus B graminis f sp tritici, crosses of sensitive and resistant parents yielded cleistothecia containing either sensitive or resistant ascospores and the segregation pattern for resistance in the F1 progeny population was 1:1. In the anisogamous fungus V inaequalis, donation of resistance was maternal and the segregation ratio 1:0. In random mating populations, the sex ratio (mating type distribution) is generally assumed to be 1:1. Therefore, the overall proportion of sensitive and resistant individuals in unselected populations is expected to be 1:1. Evolution of resistance to QoIs will depend mainly on early mitotic events; the selection process for resistant mutants in populations exposed to QoI treatments may follow mechanisms similar to those described for resistance controlled by single nuclear genes in other fungicide classes. It will remain important to understand how the mitochondrial nature of QoI resistance and factors such as mutation, recombination, selection and migration might influence the evolution of QoI resistance in different plant pathogens. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complete Structure of the 11-Subunit Bovine Mitochondrial Cytochrome bc 1 Complex
Iwata, S., Lee, J. W., Okada, K., Lee, J. K., Iwata, M., Rasmussen, B., Link, T. A., Ramaswamy, S., & Jap, B. K. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5373.64 · Cited by 1,253
Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution.
Birky, C. W. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331 · Cited by 969
Cited by
Ma, Z., & Michailides, T. J. (2005) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2005.01.011 · Cited by 628
Esser, L., Quinn, B., Li, Y.-F., Zhang, M., Elberry, M., Yu, L., Yu, C.-A., & Xia, D. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.065 · Cited by 285
Van Leeuwen, T., Vanholme, B., Van Pottelberge, S., Van Nieuwenhuyse, P., Nauen, R., Tirry, L., & Denholm, I. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802224105 · Cited by 279
Grasso, V., Palermo, S., Sierotzki, H., Garibaldi, A., & Gisi, U. (2006) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1236 · Cited by 268
Self-citationMolecular basis of resistance to cytochrome bc1inhibitors
Fisher, N., & Meunier, B. (2008) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00328.x · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Gisi, U., Sierotzki, H., Cook, A., & McCaffery, A.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-12
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 859-867
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2050013640
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.