The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular diagnostics for fungal plant pathogens
Abstract
Accurate identification of fungal phytopathogens is essential for virtually all aspects of plant pathology, from fundamental research on the biology of pathogens to the control of the diseases they cause. Although molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are routinely used in the diagnosis of human diseases, they are not yet widely used to detect and identify plant pathogens. Here we review some of the diagnostic tools currently used for fungal plant pathogens and describe some novel applications. Technological advances in PCR‐based methods, such as real‐time PCR, allow fast, accurate detection and quantification of plant pathogens and are now being applied to practical problems. Molecular methods have been used to detect several pathogens simultaneously in wheat, and to study the development of fungicide resistance in wheat pathogens. Information resulting from such work could be used to improve disease control by allowing more rational decisions to be made about the choice and use of fungicides and resistant cultivars. Molecular methods have also been applied to the study of variation in plant pathogen populations, for example detection of different mating types or virulence types. PCR‐based methods can provide new tools to monitor the exposure of a crop to pathogen inoculum that are more reliable and faster than conventional methods. This information can be used to improve disease control decision making. The development and application of molecular diagnostic methods in the future is discussed and we expect that new developments will increase the adoption of these new technologies for the diagnosis and study of plant disease. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,682
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · Cited by 36,648
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz
Förster, T. (1948) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19484370105 · Cited by 8,285
Ashburner, M. (1989) · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory eBooks · Cited by 6,756
Clark, M. F., & Adams, A. N. (1977) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475 · Cited by 4,812
Molecular Beacons: Probes that Fluoresce upon Hybridization
Tyagi, S., & Kramer, F. R. (1996) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0396-303 · Cited by 4,155
Holland, P. M., Abramson, R. D., Watson, R., & Gelfand, D. H. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.16.7276 · Cited by 2,693
Cited by
Jan, R., Asaf, S., Numan, M., Lubna, & Kim, K.-M. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11050968 · Cited by 832
Evidence for Sexuality in the Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus
Paoletti, M., Rydholm, C., Schwier, E. U., Anderson, M. J., Szakacs, G., Lutzoni, F., Debeaupuis, J.-P., Latgé, J.-P., Denning, D. W., & Dyer, P. S. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.045 · Cited by 308
Grasso, V., Palermo, S., Sierotzki, H., Garibaldi, A., & Gisi, U. (2006) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1236 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- McCartney, H. A., Foster, S. J., Fraaije, B. A., & Ward, E.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-07
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-142
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2111102243
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular diagnostics for fungal plant pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.575
- The paper
- McCartney, H. A., Foster, S. J., Fraaije, B. A., & Ward, E. (2003). Molecular diagnostics for fungal plant pathogens. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.