Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Live‐cell analysis of cell penetration ability and toxicity of oligo‐arginines

Tünnemann, Gisela, Ter‐Avetisyan, Gohar, Martin, Robert M., Stöckl, Martin, Herrmann, Andreas, Cardoso, M. Cristina·2008·Journal of Peptide Science

Abstract

Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) are useful tools to deliver low‐molecular‐weight cargoes into cells; however, their mode of uptake is still controversial. The most efficient CPPs belong to the group of arginine‐rich peptides, but a systematic assessment of their potential toxicity is lacking. In this study we combined data on the membrane translocation abilities of oligo‐arginines in living cells as a function of their chain length, concentration, stability and toxicity. Using confocal microscopy analysis of living cells we evaluated the transduction frequency of the L‐isoforms of oligo‐arginines and lysines and then monitored their associated toxicity by concomitant addition of propidium iodide. Whereas lysines showed virtually no transduction, the transduction ability of arginines increased with the number of consecutive residues and the peptide concentration, with L‐R9 and L‐R10 performing overall best. We further compared the L‐ and D‐R9 isomers and found that the D‐isoform always showed a higher transduction as compared to the L‐counterpart in all cell types. Notably, the transduction difference between D‐ and L‐forms was highly variable between cell types, emphasizing the need for protease‐resistant peptides as vectors for drug delivery. Real‐time kinetic analysis of the D‐ and L‐isomers applied simultaneously to the cells revealed a much faster transduction for the D‐variant. The latter underlies the fact that the isomers do not mix, and penetration of one peptide does not perturb the membrane in a way that gives access to the other peptide. Finally, we performed short‐ and long‐term cell viability and cell cycle progression analyses with the protease‐resistant D‐R9. Altogether, our results identified concentration windows with low toxicity and high transduction efficiency, resulting in fully bioavailable intracellular peptides. Copyright © 2007 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/psc.968

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Tünnemann, G., Ter‐Avetisyan, G., Martin, R. M., Stöckl, M., Herrmann, A., & Cardoso, M. C.
Venue
Journal of Peptide Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-11
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
469-476
ISSN
  • 1075-2617 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1387
OpenAlex
W2062253976
Cited by
286
References
1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Live‐cell analysis of cell penetration ability and toxicity of oligo‐arginines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/psc.968
The paper
Tünnemann, G., Ter‐Avetisyan, G., Martin, R. M., Stöckl, M., Herrmann, A., & Cardoso, M. C. (2008). Live‐cell analysis of cell penetration ability and toxicity of oligo‐arginines. Journal of Peptide Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.968

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.