Cited by 19Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesPharmaceutical studies and practicesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Target Mediated Drug Disposition Model of CPHPC in Patients with Systemic Amyloidosis

Open access
Sahota, T, Berges, A, Barton, S, Cookson, L, Zamuner, S, Richards, D·2015·CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

Abstract

The amyloid deposits that cause disease in systemic amyloidosis always contain the normal plasma protein, serum amyloid P (SAP) component. SAP is the target of a novel immunotherapy approach now being developed to eliminate amyloid deposits. The treatment is enabled by, and critically depends on, the use of the drug (R)‐1‐[6‐[(R)‐2‐carboxy‐pyrrolidin‐1‐yl]‐6‐oxo‐hexanoyl]pyrrolidine‐2‐carboxylic acid (CPHPC, GSK2315698, Ro 63‐8695), which depletes circulating SAP almost completely but leaves some SAP in amyloid deposits for specific recognition by subsequently administered therapeutic anti‐SAP antibodies. Herein, we report a mechanistic model that predicts, with clinically acceptable precision, the exposure‐response relationship for CPHPC, both in healthy individuals and in patients with systemic amyloidosis. The model covariates are gender, renal function, total amyloid load, and presence of hepatic amyloid, all of which are known at baseline. The model is being used to predict individualized dosing regimens in an ongoing, first‐in‐human study with anti‐SAP antibodies. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. (2015) 4, 116–126; doi:10.1002/psp4.15; published online on 4 February 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/psp4.15

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPHPC efficiently reduces SAP concentration in serum (58.5% reduction) and bone marrow (95% reduction) in aged mice.

    “Our data demonstrated that CPHPC (miridesap), developed by Pepys’ team at University College London90–92, efficiently reduces SAP concentration in serum (58.5% reduction) and bone marrow (95% reduction) in aged mice.”

    From Serum amyloid P secreted by bone marrow adipocytes drives skeletal amyloidosis (2025) · cites this paper as [92]

    The citation is attached to the description of CPHPC as developed by Pepys’ team, not to the aged-mouse reductions, which the citing authors present as their own data. The Abstract identifies CPHPC as a SAP-depleting drug, and Methods > Previous studies to support model development and evaluation links earlier CPHPC studies to M.B. Pepys (page unavailable). Our copy does not establish that his team developed the drug at University College London. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Pepys MBAmyloidosis Annu. Rev. Med 2006 57 223 241 16409147
  2. Pepys MB Dyck RF de Beer FC Skinner M Cohen AS Binding of serum amyloid P-component (SAP) by amyloid fibrils Clin. Exp. Immunol 1979 38 284 293 118839 PMC1537850
  3. Jager PL Hazenberg BP Franssen EJ Limburg PC van Rijswijk MH Piers DA Kinetic studies with iodine-123-labeled serum amyloid P component in patients with systemic AA and AL amyloidosis and assessment of clinical value J. Nucl. Med 1998 39 699 706 9544684
  4. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification Am. J. Kidney Dis 2002 39 2 Suppl 1 S1 S266 11904577

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahota, T., Berges, A., Barton, S., Cookson, L., Zamuner, S., & Richards, D.
Affiliations
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Sahota, T
Venue
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
116-126
ISSN
2163-8306 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1515410031
Cited by
19
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
systemic amyloidosis, serum amyloid P component, target-mediated drug disposition, exposure-response relationship, immunotherapy, renal function, individualized dosing, amyloid load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review