Cited by 136Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Repeat doses of antibody to serum amyloid P component clear amyloid deposits in patients with systemic amyloidosis

Open access
Richards, Duncan B., Cookson, Louise M., Barton, Sharon V., Liefaard, Lia, Lane, Thirusha, Hutt, David F., Ritter, James M., Fontana, Marianna +5 more·2018·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Repeat cycles of miridesap, to deplete circulating serum amyloid P component (SAP), followed by the anti-SAP antibody, dezamizumab, cleared visceral amyloid deposits in patients with systemic amyloidosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan3128

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPHPC efficiently reduces SAP concentration in serum (58.5% reduction) and bone marrow (95% reduction) in aged mice.

    “Our data demonstrated that CPHPC (miridesap), developed by Pepys’ team at University College London90–92, efficiently reduces SAP concentration in serum (58.5% reduction) and bone marrow (95% reduction) in aged mice.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, D. B., Cookson, L. M., Barton, S. V., Liefaard, L., Lane, T., Hutt, D. F., Ritter, J. M., Fontana, M., Moon, J. C., Gillmore, J. D., Wechalekar, A., Hawkins, P. N., & Pepys, M. B.
Affiliations
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Pepys, Mark B.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2018-01-03
Volume
10
Issue
422
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2782423765
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline (award308029, N/A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
systemic amyloidosis, cardiac amyloidosis, serum amyloid P component, anti-amyloid antibodies, amyloid deposition, spleen, kidney, antibody therapy
MeSH terms
Serum Amyloid P-Component, Amyloidosis, Antibodies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radionuclide Imaging, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review